2014Congress & the PresidencyRequires access

Choosing When to Choose: Explaining the Duration of Presidential Supreme Court Nomination Decisions

Charles R. Shipan, Brooke Thomas Allen, Andrew Bargen

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

Although the selection of Supreme Court nominees is of tremendous importance, the amount of time it takes presidents to select nominees varies dramatically across nominations. We argue that the timing of nominations is a function of the political constraints the president faces, and we focus in particular on partisan or ideological disagreement between the president and the Senate. We test our argument using all Supreme Court nominations since 1882, and find that disagreement increases this duration. In addition, we control for a variety of other factors that can affect timing. We find that a newly elected president, a nominee's personal characteristics, and Senate rule changes also increase the length of the nomination stage. On the other hand, this stage becomes shorter as the Senate nears the end of each session and as the presidency's institutional capacity has increased over time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although the selection of Supreme Court nominees is of tremendous importance, the amount of time it takes presidents to select nominees varies dramatically across nominations. We argue that the timing of nominations is a function of the political constraints the president faces, and we focus in particular on partisan or ideological disagreement between the president and the Senate. We test our argument using all Supreme Court nominations since 1882, and find that disagreement increases this duration. In addition, we control for a variety of other factors that can affect timing. We find that a newly elected president, a nominee's personal characteristics, and Senate rule changes also increase the length of the nomination stage. On the other hand, this stage becomes shorter as the Senate nears the end of each session and as the presidency's institutional capacity has increased over time.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although the selection of Supreme Court nominees is of tremendous importance, the amount of time it takes presidents to select nominees varies dramatically across nominations. We argue that the timing of nominations is a function of the political constraints the president faces, and we focus in particular on partisan or ideological disagreement between the president and the Senate. We test our argument using all Supreme Court nominations since 1882, and find that disagreement increases this duration. In addition, we control for a variety of other factors that can affect timing. We find that a newly elected president, a nominee's personal characteristics, and Senate rule changes also increase the length of the nomination stage. On the other hand, this stage becomes shorter as the Senate nears the end of each session and as the presidency's institutional capacity has increased over time.

Key concepts: Nomination, Supreme court, Presidency, Presidential system, Political science, Politics, Law, Argument (complex analysis)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Choosing When to Choose: Explaining the Duration of Presidential Supreme Court Nomination Decisions — Research Paper | ScholarLens