2006Unpublished venueRequires access

Forest Vintages and Carbon Sequestration

Clara Costa-Duarte, Maria A. Cunha‐e‐Sá, Renato Rosa

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In the current paper we examine the role of forest carbon sequestration benefits in optimal forest management. When carbon benefits are consid-ered not only the forested area is relevant, but also the flow of carbon between land and the atmosphere through the carbon cycle. To account for all these impacts a multi-vintage forest setting is used, following Salo and Tahvonen (2004). The model is extended to three different carbon accounting methods to measure the benefits form carbon sequestration: carbon flow regime, tonne-year crediting and average storage. In the case of the carbon flow regime, the impact on the optimal management and allocation of land will depend upon the amount of carbon released when the forest is harvested. Under the other two accounting systems optimal steady state forest area will be increased, and in cases where optimal man-agement imply cyclical harvesting, considering carbon benefits will always increase cycles dimension. 1 1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the current paper we examine the role of forest carbon sequestration benefits in optimal forest management. When carbon benefits are consid-ered not only the forested area is relevant, but also the flow of carbon between land and the atmosphere through the carbon cycle. To account for all these impacts a multi-vintage forest setting is used, following Salo and Tahvonen (2004). The model is extended to three different carbon accounting methods to measure the benefits form carbon sequestration: carbon flow regime, tonne-year crediting and average storage. In the case of the carbon flow regime, the impact on the optimal management and allocation of land will depend upon the amount of carbon released when the forest is harvested. Under the other two accounting systems optimal steady state forest area will be increased, and in cases where optimal man-agement imply cyclical harvesting, considering carbon benefits will always increase cycles dimension. 1 1

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the current paper we examine the role of forest carbon sequestration benefits in optimal forest management. When carbon benefits are consid-ered not only the forested area is relevant, but also the flow of carbon between land and the atmosphere through the carbon cycle. To account for all these impacts a multi-vintage forest setting is used, following Salo and Tahvonen (2004). The model is extended to three different carbon accounting methods to measure the benefits form carbon sequestration: carbon flow regime, tonne-year crediting and average storage. In the case of the carbon flow regime, the impact on the optimal management and allocation of land will depend upon the amount of carbon released when the forest is harvested. Under the other two accounting systems optimal steady state forest area will be increased, and in cases where optimal man-agement imply cyclical harvesting, considering carbon benefits will always increase cycles dimension. 1 1

Key concepts: Carbon sequestration, Carbon fibers, Tonne, Environmental science, Carbon accounting, Greenhouse gas, Carbon cycle, Natural resource economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Forest Vintages and Carbon Sequestration — Research Paper | ScholarLens