2014•Working paperOpen access

Enhancing Prudential Standards in Financial Regulations

Franklin Allen, Itay Goldstein, Julapa A. Jagtiani, William Warner Lang

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

The financial crisis has generated fundamental reforms in the financial regulatory system in the U.S. and internationally.Much of this reform was in direct response to the weaknesses revealed in the precrisis system.The new "macroprudential" approach to financial regulations focuses on risks arising in financial markets broadly, as well as the potential impact on the financial system that may arise from financial distress at systemically important financial institutions.Systemic risk is the key factor in financial stability, but our current understanding of systemic risk is rather limited.While the goal of using regulation to maintain financial stability is clear, it is not obvious how to design an effective regulatory framework that achieves the financial stability objective while also promoting financial innovations.This paper discusses academic research and expert opinions on this vital subject of financial stability and regulatory reforms.Specifically, among other issues, it discusses the impact of increasing public disclosure of supervisory information, the effectiveness of bank stress testing as a tool to enhance financial stability, whether the financial crisis was caused by too big to fail (TBTF), and whether the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (DFA) resolution regime would be effective in achieving financial stability and ending TBTF.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The financial crisis has generated fundamental reforms in the financial regulatory system in the U.S. and internationally.Much of this reform was in direct response to the weaknesses revealed in the precrisis system.The new "macroprudential" approach to financial regulations focuses on risks arising in financial markets broadly, as well as the potential impact on the financial system that may arise from financial distress at systemically important financial institutions.Systemic risk is the key factor in financial stability, but our current understanding of systemic risk is rather limited.While the goal of using regulation to maintain financial stability is clear, it is not obvious how to design an effective regulatory framework that achieves the financial stability objective while also promoting financial innovations.This paper discusses academic research and expert opinions on this vital subject of financial stability and regulatory reforms.Specifically, among other issues, it discusses the impact of increasing public disclosure of supervisory information, the effectiveness of bank stress testing as a tool to enhance financial stability, whether the financial crisis was caused by too big to fail (TBTF), and whether the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (DFA) resolution regime would be effective in achieving financial stability and ending TBTF.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The financial crisis has generated fundamental reforms in the financial regulatory system in the U.S. and internationally.Much of this reform was in direct response to the weaknesses revealed in the precrisis system.The new "macroprudential" approach to financial regulations focuses on risks arising in financial markets broadly, as well as the potential impact on the financial system that may arise from financial distress at systemically important financial institutions.Systemic risk is the key factor in financial stability, but our current understanding of systemic risk is rather limited.While the goal of using regulation to maintain financial stability is clear, it is not obvious how to design an effective regulatory framework that achieves the financial stability objective while also promoting financial innovations.This paper discusses academic research and expert opinions on this vital subject of financial stability and regulatory reforms.Specifically, among other issues, it discusses the impact of increasing public disclosure of supervisory information, the effectiveness of bank stress testing as a tool to enhance financial stability, whether the financial crisis was caused by too big to fail (TBTF), and whether the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (DFA) resolution regime would be effective in achieving financial stability and ending TBTF.

Key concepts: Business, Accounting, Finance, Financial system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Enhancing Prudential Standards in Financial Regulations — Research Paper | ScholarLens