Optimal trade policy, equilibrium unemployment, and labor market inefficiency
Wisarut Suwanprasert
Abstract
Wisarut Suwanprasert
Abstract
Abstract Under which circumstances is using trade policies to prevent job losses welfare improving? To answer this question, I incorporate a frictional labor market into the Heckscher–Ohlin model. The results suggest that (a) a country that has an inefficient level of unemployment may experience welfare losses from free trade; (b) having search‐generated unemployment is not sufficient to justify a use of trade policy, because free trade is still optimal when the labor market is constrained‐efficient; and (c) a small country that has an inefficient level of unemployment can use trade policy to improve its welfare.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Under which circumstances is using trade policies to prevent job losses welfare improving? To answer this question, I incorporate a frictional labor market into the Heckscher–Ohlin model. The results suggest that (a) a country that has an inefficient level of unemployment may experience welfare losses from free trade; (b) having search‐generated unemployment is not sufficient to justify a use of trade policy, because free trade is still optimal when the labor market is constrained‐efficient; and (c) a small country that has an inefficient level of unemployment can use trade policy to improve its welfare.
Key concepts: Economics, Unemployment, Inefficiency, Welfare, Free trade, Commercial policy, General equilibrium theory, Labour economics