2001RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

Disentangling Treatment Effects of Polish Active Labor Market Policies: Evidence from Matched Samples

Jochen Kluve, Hartmut F. Lehmann, Christoph M. Schmidt

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

This paper estimates causal effects of two Polish active labor market policies – Training and\nIntervention Works – on employment probabilities. Using data from the 18th wave of the\nPolish Labor Force Survey we discuss three stages of an appropriately designed matching\nprocedure and demonstrate how the method succeeds in balancing relevant covariates. The\nvalidity of this approach is illustrated using the estimated propensity score as a summary\nmeasure of balance. We implement a conditional difference-in-differences estimator of\ntreatment effects based on individual trinomial sequences of pre-treatment labor market\nstatus. Our findings suggest that Training raises employment probability, while Intervention\nWorks seems to lead to a negative treatment effect for men. Furthermore, we find that\nappropriate subdivision of the matched sample for conditional treatment effect estimation can\nadd considerable insight to the interpretation of results.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper estimates causal effects of two Polish active labor market policies – Training and\nIntervention Works – on employment probabilities. Using data from the 18th wave of the\nPolish Labor Force Survey we discuss three stages of an appropriately designed matching\nprocedure and demonstrate how the method succeeds in balancing relevant covariates. The\nvalidity of this approach is illustrated using the estimated propensity score as a summary\nmeasure of balance. We implement a conditional difference-in-differences estimator of\ntreatment effects based on individual trinomial sequences of pre-treatment labor market\nstatus. Our findings suggest that Training raises employment probability, while Intervention\nWorks seems to lead to a negative treatment effect for men. Furthermore, we find that\nappropriate subdivision of the matched sample for conditional treatment effect estimation can\nadd considerable insight to the interpretation of results.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper estimates causal effects of two Polish active labor market policies – Training and\nIntervention Works – on employment probabilities. Using data from the 18th wave of the\nPolish Labor Force Survey we discuss three stages of an appropriately designed matching\nprocedure and demonstrate how the method succeeds in balancing relevant covariates. The\nvalidity of this approach is illustrated using the estimated propensity score as a summary\nmeasure of balance. We implement a conditional difference-in-differences estimator of\ntreatment effects based on individual trinomial sequences of pre-treatment labor market\nstatus. Our findings suggest that Training raises employment probability, while Intervention\nWorks seems to lead to a negative treatment effect for men. Furthermore, we find that\nappropriate subdivision of the matched sample for conditional treatment effect estimation can\nadd considerable insight to the interpretation of results.

Key concepts: Average treatment effect, Propensity score matching, Matching (statistics), Intervention (counseling), Estimator, Difference in differences, Econometrics, Treatment effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Disentangling Treatment Effects of Polish Active Labor Market Policies: Evidence from Matched Samples — Research Paper | ScholarLens