2019•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

EFFECTS OF NON-FARM INCOME ON POVERTY AND INEQUALITY IN RURAL BANGLADESH

Md. Jamal Hossain, A. Debnath, M. F. Imam, Mohammad Ariful Islam, F. Elahi, M. J. Hossain, A. Debnath, M. F. Imam, M. A. Islam, F. Elahi

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

The present study examines the impact of non-farm income on poverty and expenditure inequality in rural Bangladesh using a nationally representative Household Income Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2010 data. This study used Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimator of the Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke (FGT) indices to investigate the effect of non-farm income on poverty. The results reveal that the inclusion of non-farm income reduces the level, depth and severity of poverty in rural Bangladesh. In addition, poverty maps help the policymakers to identify the location of the relatively higher concentration of poor people. However, Gini, Theil’s and Atkinson inequality measures show that the inclusion of non-farm income increased expenditure inequality among rural households. This research also employed a probit model for identifying the most significant factors associated with non-farm income participation of the rural households. The results imply that higher levels of education, greater flow of remittances, availability of electricity facilities and involvement in high return sector are likely to be effective in rising non-farm income at the rural household level. The policy implication of this study is non-farm income generating activities should be encouraged among rural households to reduce poverty and hence, to improve welfare and living standards of the rural households.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The present study examines the impact of non-farm income on poverty and expenditure inequality in rural Bangladesh using a nationally representative Household Income Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2010 data. This study used Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimator of the Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke (FGT) indices to investigate the effect of non-farm income on poverty. The results reveal that the inclusion of non-farm income reduces the level, depth and severity of poverty in rural Bangladesh. In addition, poverty maps help the policymakers to identify the location of the relatively higher concentration of poor people. However, Gini, Theil’s and Atkinson inequality measures show that the inclusion of non-farm income increased expenditure inequality among rural households. This research also employed a probit model for identifying the most significant factors associated with non-farm income participation of the rural households. The results imply that higher levels of education, greater flow of remittances, availability of electricity facilities and involvement in high return sector are likely to be effective in rising non-farm income at the rural household level. The policy implication of this study is non-farm income generating activities should be encouraged among rural households to reduce poverty and hence, to improve welfare and living standards of the rural households.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The present study examines the impact of non-farm income on poverty and expenditure inequality in rural Bangladesh using a nationally representative Household Income Expenditure Survey (HIES) 2010 data. This study used Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimator of the Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke (FGT) indices to investigate the effect of non-farm income on poverty. The results reveal that the inclusion of non-farm income reduces the level, depth and severity of poverty in rural Bangladesh. In addition, poverty maps help the policymakers to identify the location of the relatively higher concentration of poor people. However, Gini, Theil’s and Atkinson inequality measures show that the inclusion of non-farm income increased expenditure inequality among rural households. This research also employed a probit model for identifying the most significant factors associated with non-farm income participation of the rural households. The results imply that higher levels of education, greater flow of remittances, availability of electricity facilities and involvement in high return sector are likely to be effective in rising non-farm income at the rural household level. The policy implication of this study is non-farm income generating activities should be encouraged among rural households to reduce poverty and hence, to improve welfare and living standards of the rural households.

Key concepts: Poverty, Economics, Welfare, Household income, Rural poverty, Inequality, Probit model, Rural area

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EFFECTS OF NON-FARM INCOME ON POVERTY AND INEQUALITY IN RURAL BANGLADESH — Research Paper | ScholarLens