Tax rulings and State aid: musings on recovery
Dimitrios Kyriazis
Abstract
Dimitrios Kyriazis
Abstract
This chapter examines the challenges raised by the process of State aid recovery in the recent tax rulings’ cases. After providing some general background, the chapter sets out the approach of the Commission and the General Court in their most recent decisions and judgments. It is shown that both institutions found that ordering recovery was not legally problematic. In this chapter, their reasoning will be dissected and challenged. Moreover, it will be argued that a series of compelling arguments militate against ordering recovery in the tax rulings’ cases involving the application of an EU law-derived arm’s length principle.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter examines the challenges raised by the process of State aid recovery in the recent tax rulings’ cases. After providing some general background, the chapter sets out the approach of the Commission and the General Court in their most recent decisions and judgments. It is shown that both institutions found that ordering recovery was not legally problematic. In this chapter, their reasoning will be dissected and challenged. Moreover, it will be argued that a series of compelling arguments militate against ordering recovery in the tax rulings’ cases involving the application of an EU law-derived arm’s length principle.
Key concepts: Commission, State (computer science), Law and economics, Political science, Process (computing), Tax law, Economics, Law