2004RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Wages Behaviour and Unemployment in Keynes and New Keynesians Views. A Comparison

Nicola Meccheri

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The paper compares different strands of New Keynesian Economics with respect to Keynes's original work on wages, describing which are the most relevant differences and analogies. In particular, two issues are analysed in detail. First, the explanations provided by Keynes and New Keynesians of nominal and real wages behaviour. Second, the different theories and interpretations concerning the ability of flexible nominal wages in assuring full employment in the economy. It is argued that, although persistent involuntary unemployment is acentral and continuing problem both in Keynes and New Keynesians views, referring to the role of nominal and/or real wages behaviour in explaining unemployment, New Keynesian theories present features which differ, sometimes substantially, from the ideas and concepts developed by Keynes in his General Theory.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper compares different strands of New Keynesian Economics with respect to Keynes's original work on wages, describing which are the most relevant differences and analogies. In particular, two issues are analysed in detail. First, the explanations provided by Keynes and New Keynesians of nominal and real wages behaviour. Second, the different theories and interpretations concerning the ability of flexible nominal wages in assuring full employment in the economy. It is argued that, although persistent involuntary unemployment is acentral and continuing problem both in Keynes and New Keynesians views, referring to the role of nominal and/or real wages behaviour in explaining unemployment, New Keynesian theories present features which differ, sometimes substantially, from the ideas and concepts developed by Keynes in his General Theory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper compares different strands of New Keynesian Economics with respect to Keynes's original work on wages, describing which are the most relevant differences and analogies. In particular, two issues are analysed in detail. First, the explanations provided by Keynes and New Keynesians of nominal and real wages behaviour. Second, the different theories and interpretations concerning the ability of flexible nominal wages in assuring full employment in the economy. It is argued that, although persistent involuntary unemployment is acentral and continuing problem both in Keynes and New Keynesians views, referring to the role of nominal and/or real wages behaviour in explaining unemployment, New Keynesian theories present features which differ, sometimes substantially, from the ideas and concepts developed by Keynes in his General Theory.

Key concepts: Economics, Unemployment, Keynesian economics, Post-Keynesian economics, Full employment, Neo-Keynesian economics, General theory, Involuntary unemployment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Wages Behaviour and Unemployment in Keynes and New Keynesians Views. A Comparison — Research Paper | ScholarLens