2013•Journal of financial perspectivesRequires access

Safe to Fail

Thomas F. Huertas

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Banks cannot be made fail-safe. But they can be made safe to fail, so that the failure of a bank need not disrupt the economy at large nor pose cost to the taxpayer. In other words, banks can be made resolvable, and “too big to fail” can come to an end. To do so, the authorities, banks and financial market infrastructures need to prepare in advance for what amounts to a pre-pack reorganization of the bank that the resolution authority can implement over a weekend, if the bank reaches the point of non-viability in private markets (fails to meet threshold conditions). This pre-pack consists of two principal elements: (i) a recapitalization of the bank through the bail-in of investor instruments and (ii) the provision of liquidity to the bank-in-resolution. Creating such a pre-pack solution should form the core of the resolution plans that authorities are developing for global systemically important financial institutions. This paper sets out the conditions that must be met for a bank to be resolvable, the “safe-to-fail” test and the banking structures required in order to meet this test. How banks are organized matters less than what banks, authorities and financial market infrastructures do to prepare for the possibility that resolution may be required. The paper concludes with an agenda for action to ensure that too big to fail is not too tough to solve.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Banks cannot be made fail-safe. But they can be made safe to fail, so that the failure of a bank need not disrupt the economy at large nor pose cost to the taxpayer. In other words, banks can be made resolvable, and “too big to fail” can come to an end. To do so, the authorities, banks and financial market infrastructures need to prepare in advance for what amounts to a pre-pack reorganization of the bank that the resolution authority can implement over a weekend, if the bank reaches the point of non-viability in private markets (fails to meet threshold conditions). This pre-pack consists of two principal elements: (i) a recapitalization of the bank through the bail-in of investor instruments and (ii) the provision of liquidity to the bank-in-resolution. Creating such a pre-pack solution should form the core of the resolution plans that authorities are developing for global systemically important financial institutions. This paper sets out the conditions that must be met for a bank to be resolvable, the “safe-to-fail” test and the banking structures required in order to meet this test. How banks are organized matters less than what banks, authorities and financial market infrastructures do to prepare for the possibility that resolution may be required. The paper concludes with an agenda for action to ensure that too big to fail is not too tough to solve.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Banks cannot be made fail-safe. But they can be made safe to fail, so that the failure of a bank need not disrupt the economy at large nor pose cost to the taxpayer. In other words, banks can be made resolvable, and “too big to fail” can come to an end. To do so, the authorities, banks and financial market infrastructures need to prepare in advance for what amounts to a pre-pack reorganization of the bank that the resolution authority can implement over a weekend, if the bank reaches the point of non-viability in private markets (fails to meet threshold conditions). This pre-pack consists of two principal elements: (i) a recapitalization of the bank through the bail-in of investor instruments and (ii) the provision of liquidity to the bank-in-resolution. Creating such a pre-pack solution should form the core of the resolution plans that authorities are developing for global systemically important financial institutions. This paper sets out the conditions that must be met for a bank to be resolvable, the “safe-to-fail” test and the banking structures required in order to meet this test. How banks are organized matters less than what banks, authorities and financial market infrastructures do to prepare for the possibility that resolution may be required. The paper concludes with an agenda for action to ensure that too big to fail is not too tough to solve.

Key concepts: Recapitalization, Too big to fail, Order (exchange), Taxpayer, Market liquidity, Business, Open market operation, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safe to Fail — Research Paper | ScholarLens