2011The Journal of Portfolio ManagementRequires access

The Microstructure of the “Flash Crash”: Flow Toxicity, Liquidity Crashes, and the Probability of Informed Trading

David Easley, Marcos López de Prado, Maureen O’Hara

Open publisher page 405 citations

Abstract

The “flash crash” of May 6, 2010, was the second-largest point swing (1,010.14 points) and the biggest one-day point decline (998.5 points) in the history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. For a few minutes, $1 trillion in market value vanished. In this article, the authors argue that the flash crash was the result of the new dynamics at play in the current market structure. They highlight the role played by order toxicity in affecting liquidity provision, and they show that a measure of this toxicity, the volume synchronized probability of informed trading (VPIN), captures the increasing toxicity of the order flow in the hours and days prior to collapse. Because the flash crash might have been avoided had liquidity providers remained in the marketplace, a solution is proposed in the form of a “VPIN contract” that would allow liquidity providers to dynamically monitor and manage their risks. TOPICS: Financial crises and financial market history , exchanges/markets/clearinghouses , in markets

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The “flash crash” of May 6, 2010, was the second-largest point swing (1,010.14 points) and the biggest one-day point decline (998.5 points) in the history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. For a few minutes, $1 trillion in market value vanished. In this article, the authors argue that the flash crash was the result of the new dynamics at play in the current market structure. They highlight the role played by order toxicity in affecting liquidity provision, and they show that a measure of this toxicity, the volume synchronized probability of informed trading (VPIN), captures the increasing toxicity of the order flow in the hours and days prior to collapse. Because the flash crash might have been avoided had liquidity providers remained in the marketplace, a solution is proposed in the form of a “VPIN contract” that would allow liquidity providers to dynamically monitor and manage their risks. TOPICS: Financial crises and financial market history , exchanges/markets/clearinghouses , in markets

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 405 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The “flash crash” of May 6, 2010, was the second-largest point swing (1,010.14 points) and the biggest one-day point decline (998.5 points) in the history of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. For a few minutes, $1 trillion in market value vanished. In this article, the authors argue that the flash crash was the result of the new dynamics at play in the current market structure. They highlight the role played by order toxicity in affecting liquidity provision, and they show that a measure of this toxicity, the volume synchronized probability of informed trading (VPIN), captures the increasing toxicity of the order flow in the hours and days prior to collapse. Because the flash crash might have been avoided had liquidity providers remained in the marketplace, a solution is proposed in the form of a “VPIN contract” that would allow liquidity providers to dynamically monitor and manage their risks. TOPICS: Financial crises and financial market history , exchanges/markets/clearinghouses , in markets

Key concepts: Market liquidity, Crash, Order (exchange), Business, Actuarial science, Finance, Computer science, Programming language

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Microstructure of the “Flash Crash”: Flow Toxicity, Liquidity Crashes, and the Probability of Informed Trading — Research Paper | ScholarLens