Tort Law Culture in the United Kingdom: Image and Reality in Personal Injury Compensation
Richard Lewis, Annette Morris
Abstract
Richard Lewis, Annette Morris
Abstract
This article highlights two contrasting sets of images of tort that are dominant in UK culture. The first set reflects various aspects of the traditional portrayal of justice, which depicts tort as an independent ʻnaturalʼ system of rules of universal application forming the foundation of a just society. The second group of images is more recent and relates to the perceived development of a damaging compensation culture. Focusing on personal injury litigation, we show, in different ways and to different degrees, how these portrayals differ from the reality of tort in practice. In explaining how tort actually operates we reveal significant features of the culture of tort. In practice it is heavily influenced by institutional arrangements: the importance of both welfare provision and liability insurance is highlighted, and the effects of a ʻno-win no-feeʼ claims market are examined. The article reveals that the operation of tort is very much affected by commercial interests and the economic demands of the institutions which surround it. Overall we conclude that the cultural images of tort examined fail to reflect how the system of compensation for personal injury actually operates in practice.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article highlights two contrasting sets of images of tort that are dominant in UK culture. The first set reflects various aspects of the traditional portrayal of justice, which depicts tort as an independent ʻnaturalʼ system of rules of universal application forming the foundation of a just society. The second group of images is more recent and relates to the perceived development of a damaging compensation culture. Focusing on personal injury litigation, we show, in different ways and to different degrees, how these portrayals differ from the reality of tort in practice. In explaining how tort actually operates we reveal significant features of the culture of tort. In practice it is heavily influenced by institutional arrangements: the importance of both welfare provision and liability insurance is highlighted, and the effects of a ʻno-win no-feeʼ claims market are examined. The article reveals that the operation of tort is very much affected by commercial interests and the economic demands of the institutions which surround it. Overall we conclude that the cultural images of tort examined fail to reflect how the system of compensation for personal injury actually operates in practice.
Key concepts: Tort, Personal injury, Compensation (psychology), Law, Economic Justice, Tort reform, Business, Liability