2019•Company and securities law journalRequires access

Does s 191 of the Corporations Act include Conflicting Duties

Rosemary Teele Langford, Ian Ramsay

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An important issue is whether s 191 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – which requires directors to disclose material personal interests – includes conflicting duties. In other words, where a director faces a conflict between duties to different entities or persons (rather than a conflict of interest) is the director obliged to disclose this in accordance with s 191? This issue has not been the subject of detailed research and has not been resolved. In this research note the authors argue that conflicting duties do need to be disclosed under s  191. This is for three reasons. First, a close review of the Parliamentary materials surrounding s 191 indicates no intention to exclude conflicting duties from the disclosure requirements. Second, there is evidence that those involved in reform of the statutory disclosure provisions were of the view that conflicts of interest include conflicting duties and therefore there was no need to explicitly mention conflicting duties in the statutory provisions dealing with disclosure of interests. Third, in policy terms, conflicting duties have the potential to inhibit a director’s exercise of their duties and powers in good faith in the interests of the company and therefore should be disclosed under s 191.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An important issue is whether s 191 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – which requires directors to disclose material personal interests – includes conflicting duties. In other words, where a director faces a conflict between duties to different entities or persons (rather than a conflict of interest) is the director obliged to disclose this in accordance with s 191? This issue has not been the subject of detailed research and has not been resolved. In this research note the authors argue that conflicting duties do need to be disclosed under s  191. This is for three reasons. First, a close review of the Parliamentary materials surrounding s 191 indicates no intention to exclude conflicting duties from the disclosure requirements. Second, there is evidence that those involved in reform of the statutory disclosure provisions were of the view that conflicts of interest include conflicting duties and therefore there was no need to explicitly mention conflicting duties in the statutory provisions dealing with disclosure of interests. Third, in policy terms, conflicting duties have the potential to inhibit a director’s exercise of their duties and powers in good faith in the interests of the company and therefore should be disclosed under s 191.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An important issue is whether s 191 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – which requires directors to disclose material personal interests – includes conflicting duties. In other words, where a director faces a conflict between duties to different entities or persons (rather than a conflict of interest) is the director obliged to disclose this in accordance with s 191? This issue has not been the subject of detailed research and has not been resolved. In this research note the authors argue that conflicting duties do need to be disclosed under s  191. This is for three reasons. First, a close review of the Parliamentary materials surrounding s 191 indicates no intention to exclude conflicting duties from the disclosure requirements. Second, there is evidence that those involved in reform of the statutory disclosure provisions were of the view that conflicts of interest include conflicting duties and therefore there was no need to explicitly mention conflicting duties in the statutory provisions dealing with disclosure of interests. Third, in policy terms, conflicting duties have the potential to inhibit a director’s exercise of their duties and powers in good faith in the interests of the company and therefore should be disclosed under s 191.

Key concepts: Statutory law, Subject (documents), Conflict of interest, Law, Bad faith, Business, Faith, Good faith

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Does s 191 of the Corporations Act include Conflicting Duties — Research Paper | ScholarLens