1997SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Litigation, Experimentation, and Reputation

Bill Z. Yang

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Author's description: In suits involving products liability, environmental harms, and antitrust violations, there are frequently several potential or actual plaintiffs who bring separate suits. The purpose of this paper is to examine the defendant's settlement behavior in such settings, where plaintiffs have private information about their case -- in particular, about the damages they have sustained. The paper develops a model in which the defendant negotiates sequentially with a series of multiple plaintiffs, where there is a correlation across plaintiffs' damage levels. The paper argues that the defendant will rationally engage in experimentation in order to learn (or, sometimes, to remain uninformed about) the plaintiffs' private information; and that the defendant may play tougher (or, sometimes, softer) in settlement bargaining in early cases, given that he anticipates future suits.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Author's description: In suits involving products liability, environmental harms, and antitrust violations, there are frequently several potential or actual plaintiffs who bring separate suits. The purpose of this paper is to examine the defendant's settlement behavior in such settings, where plaintiffs have private information about their case -- in particular, about the damages they have sustained. The paper develops a model in which the defendant negotiates sequentially with a series of multiple plaintiffs, where there is a correlation across plaintiffs' damage levels. The paper argues that the defendant will rationally engage in experimentation in order to learn (or, sometimes, to remain uninformed about) the plaintiffs' private information; and that the defendant may play tougher (or, sometimes, softer) in settlement bargaining in early cases, given that he anticipates future suits.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Author's description: In suits involving products liability, environmental harms, and antitrust violations, there are frequently several potential or actual plaintiffs who bring separate suits. The purpose of this paper is to examine the defendant's settlement behavior in such settings, where plaintiffs have private information about their case -- in particular, about the damages they have sustained. The paper develops a model in which the defendant negotiates sequentially with a series of multiple plaintiffs, where there is a correlation across plaintiffs' damage levels. The paper argues that the defendant will rationally engage in experimentation in order to learn (or, sometimes, to remain uninformed about) the plaintiffs' private information; and that the defendant may play tougher (or, sometimes, softer) in settlement bargaining in early cases, given that he anticipates future suits.

Key concepts: Plaintiff, Reputation, Settlement (finance), Damages, Liability, Law, Business, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Litigation, Experimentation, and Reputation — Research Paper | ScholarLens