2021•Unpublished venueRequires access

Civil-military relations and military change

Cornelia Baciu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter argues that Huntington’s professionalism paradigm of civil-military relations, on which global security governance actors usually rely on in their foreign policy policies and grand strategies, is not sufficient to explain civil-military relations and military change in hybrid orders. The chapter critically discusses the key specialist literature on civil-military relations, by looking in particular at institutionalist, sociological and pluralist models. The determinants of military change and transformation can be endogenous or exogenous to the military institution. The chapter explains the conceptual underpinnings of two types of sources of military change, on which the book focuses in particular: civil-military relations and cultural change in the military institution (normative change or strategic adaptation).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter argues that Huntington’s professionalism paradigm of civil-military relations, on which global security governance actors usually rely on in their foreign policy policies and grand strategies, is not sufficient to explain civil-military relations and military change in hybrid orders. The chapter critically discusses the key specialist literature on civil-military relations, by looking in particular at institutionalist, sociological and pluralist models. The determinants of military change and transformation can be endogenous or exogenous to the military institution. The chapter explains the conceptual underpinnings of two types of sources of military change, on which the book focuses in particular: civil-military relations and cultural change in the military institution (normative change or strategic adaptation).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter argues that Huntington’s professionalism paradigm of civil-military relations, on which global security governance actors usually rely on in their foreign policy policies and grand strategies, is not sufficient to explain civil-military relations and military change in hybrid orders. The chapter critically discusses the key specialist literature on civil-military relations, by looking in particular at institutionalist, sociological and pluralist models. The determinants of military change and transformation can be endogenous or exogenous to the military institution. The chapter explains the conceptual underpinnings of two types of sources of military change, on which the book focuses in particular: civil-military relations and cultural change in the military institution (normative change or strategic adaptation).

Key concepts: Civil–military relations, Political science, Aeronautics, Engineering, Law, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Civil-military relations and military change — Research Paper | ScholarLens