1986Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University)Open access

The Black Hills Aspen : Management Implications from Treatment Results

S. Riley

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

In the summer of 1984, 154 quaking aspen stands were sampled throughout the Black Hills National Forest in the Black Hills of South Dakota. The purpose of the study was to develop management directions based on existing treatment results. Some examples of treatments are clearcutting, thinning and removing all aspen while leaving various numbers of conifers on the stand. The purpose of treatment is to rejuvenate the aspen stand. Various data were collected and interpreted in two ways. A multivariate analysis was used to correlate numerous independent variables to the dependent variable, aspen regeneration index (feet of regeneration per acre). The selected model explained 54 percent of the variability associated with the regeneration index. Secondly, sites classified separated based on geologic formation and soil genesis. In this classification, 10 aspen groups were defined. A key was developed for managers to delineate aspen groups. Detailed descriptions of each aspen group and specific management recommendations are presented.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the summer of 1984, 154 quaking aspen stands were sampled throughout the Black Hills National Forest in the Black Hills of South Dakota. The purpose of the study was to develop management directions based on existing treatment results. Some examples of treatments are clearcutting, thinning and removing all aspen while leaving various numbers of conifers on the stand. The purpose of treatment is to rejuvenate the aspen stand. Various data were collected and interpreted in two ways. A multivariate analysis was used to correlate numerous independent variables to the dependent variable, aspen regeneration index (feet of regeneration per acre). The selected model explained 54 percent of the variability associated with the regeneration index. Secondly, sites classified separated based on geologic formation and soil genesis. In this classification, 10 aspen groups were defined. A key was developed for managers to delineate aspen groups. Detailed descriptions of each aspen group and specific management recommendations are presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the summer of 1984, 154 quaking aspen stands were sampled throughout the Black Hills National Forest in the Black Hills of South Dakota. The purpose of the study was to develop management directions based on existing treatment results. Some examples of treatments are clearcutting, thinning and removing all aspen while leaving various numbers of conifers on the stand. The purpose of treatment is to rejuvenate the aspen stand. Various data were collected and interpreted in two ways. A multivariate analysis was used to correlate numerous independent variables to the dependent variable, aspen regeneration index (feet of regeneration per acre). The selected model explained 54 percent of the variability associated with the regeneration index. Secondly, sites classified separated based on geologic formation and soil genesis. In this classification, 10 aspen groups were defined. A key was developed for managers to delineate aspen groups. Detailed descriptions of each aspen group and specific management recommendations are presented.

Key concepts: Geology, Forestry, Geography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Black Hills Aspen : Management Implications from Treatment Results — Research Paper | ScholarLens