2021SKIN The Journal of Cutaneous MedicineOpen access

What is the True Etiology of “Recurrent Shingles”?

Ramya Vangipuram, Harrison P. Nguyen, Stephen K. Tyring

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the true etiology of cases of putative recurrent shingles referred to a dermatology clinic. Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients aged 15-87 years with reported recurrent herpes zoster was conducted. Vesicular fluid and serology for herpes simplex 1, 2, and varicella zoster virus immunoglobulins were obtained from patients presenting with vesicles. Biopsies were obtained from patients with ambiguous presentations. Results: 44 patients (56%) had evidence of herpes simplex virus infection. 32% of patients had positive herpes simplex virus cultures or polymerase chain reaction sequencing, and 24% additional patients were diagnosed with presumptive simplex infection based on elevated antibody titers. 44% of patients had a diagnosis other than zoster or simplex. One individual had a positive viral culture for varicella zoster virus. 99% of patients who presented with suspected recurrent herpes zoster had no definitive evidence of varicella zoster virus reactivation. Conclusions: The most common diagnosis was herpes simplex infection. Our results suggest that true recurrent shingles in immunocompetent patients is rare.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose: To determine the true etiology of cases of putative recurrent shingles referred to a dermatology clinic. Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients aged 15-87 years with reported recurrent herpes zoster was conducted. Vesicular fluid and serology for herpes simplex 1, 2, and varicella zoster virus immunoglobulins were obtained from patients presenting with vesicles. Biopsies were obtained from patients with ambiguous presentations. Results: 44 patients (56%) had evidence of herpes simplex virus infection. 32% of patients had positive herpes simplex virus cultures or polymerase chain reaction sequencing, and 24% additional patients were diagnosed with presumptive simplex infection based on elevated antibody titers. 44% of patients had a diagnosis other than zoster or simplex. One individual had a positive viral culture for varicella zoster virus. 99% of patients who presented with suspected recurrent herpes zoster had no definitive evidence of varicella zoster virus reactivation. Conclusions: The most common diagnosis was herpes simplex infection. Our results suggest that true recurrent shingles in immunocompetent patients is rare.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose: To determine the true etiology of cases of putative recurrent shingles referred to a dermatology clinic. Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients aged 15-87 years with reported recurrent herpes zoster was conducted. Vesicular fluid and serology for herpes simplex 1, 2, and varicella zoster virus immunoglobulins were obtained from patients presenting with vesicles. Biopsies were obtained from patients with ambiguous presentations. Results: 44 patients (56%) had evidence of herpes simplex virus infection. 32% of patients had positive herpes simplex virus cultures or polymerase chain reaction sequencing, and 24% additional patients were diagnosed with presumptive simplex infection based on elevated antibody titers. 44% of patients had a diagnosis other than zoster or simplex. One individual had a positive viral culture for varicella zoster virus. 99% of patients who presented with suspected recurrent herpes zoster had no definitive evidence of varicella zoster virus reactivation. Conclusions: The most common diagnosis was herpes simplex infection. Our results suggest that true recurrent shingles in immunocompetent patients is rare.

Key concepts: Shingles, Medicine, Varicella zoster virus, Herpes simplex virus, Etiology, Serology, Virus, Virology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
What is the True Etiology of “Recurrent Shingles”? — Research Paper | ScholarLens