2020Journal of Korean Coaching ResearchRequires access

An Analysis of the Research Trends of Coaching Leadership

충남대학교 경영학부, Suyoung Ryu, Na-Ri Je

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest future research through analyzing the research trends of coaching leadership on refereed journals in South Korea. To this end, this study analyzes the research trends of coaching leadership for 81 articles published on the registered (candidate) journals in the areas of publication years, samplings, measurement scales, fields of study, research methods, and research models of empirical studies. The analysis results are as follows. First, for the year of publication, the studies of coaching leadership have been dramatically increased since 2015 and the largest number of studies were published in 2018. Second, the field of research was mainly studied in the area of social science. Third, for the research method, empirical studies were mainly conducted and diverse methods such as the case study, meta-analysis, and scale development have been performed since 2010. Fourth, for measurement scales, 68 of 73 empirical studies were able to identify scales and 50 of the 68 studies adopted Stowell’s (1986) scale. Fifth, 39 of 73 studies were sampled from corporations. Sixth, for research models in empirical studies, coaching leadership was examined as an independent variable in 63 studies, and organizational commitment was frequently reviewed as the effectiveness of coaching leadership. In addition, 50 studies reviewed the effects of mediating variables, whereas just 13 articles studied the effects of moderating variables.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study is to suggest future research through analyzing the research trends of coaching leadership on refereed journals in South Korea. To this end, this study analyzes the research trends of coaching leadership for 81 articles published on the registered (candidate) journals in the areas of publication years, samplings, measurement scales, fields of study, research methods, and research models of empirical studies. The analysis results are as follows. First, for the year of publication, the studies of coaching leadership have been dramatically increased since 2015 and the largest number of studies were published in 2018. Second, the field of research was mainly studied in the area of social science. Third, for the research method, empirical studies were mainly conducted and diverse methods such as the case study, meta-analysis, and scale development have been performed since 2010. Fourth, for measurement scales, 68 of 73 empirical studies were able to identify scales and 50 of the 68 studies adopted Stowell’s (1986) scale. Fifth, 39 of 73 studies were sampled from corporations. Sixth, for research models in empirical studies, coaching leadership was examined as an independent variable in 63 studies, and organizational commitment was frequently reviewed as the effectiveness of coaching leadership. In addition, 50 studies reviewed the effects of mediating variables, whereas just 13 articles studied the effects of moderating variables.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study is to suggest future research through analyzing the research trends of coaching leadership on refereed journals in South Korea. To this end, this study analyzes the research trends of coaching leadership for 81 articles published on the registered (candidate) journals in the areas of publication years, samplings, measurement scales, fields of study, research methods, and research models of empirical studies. The analysis results are as follows. First, for the year of publication, the studies of coaching leadership have been dramatically increased since 2015 and the largest number of studies were published in 2018. Second, the field of research was mainly studied in the area of social science. Third, for the research method, empirical studies were mainly conducted and diverse methods such as the case study, meta-analysis, and scale development have been performed since 2010. Fourth, for measurement scales, 68 of 73 empirical studies were able to identify scales and 50 of the 68 studies adopted Stowell’s (1986) scale. Fifth, 39 of 73 studies were sampled from corporations. Sixth, for research models in empirical studies, coaching leadership was examined as an independent variable in 63 studies, and organizational commitment was frequently reviewed as the effectiveness of coaching leadership. In addition, 50 studies reviewed the effects of mediating variables, whereas just 13 articles studied the effects of moderating variables.

Key concepts: Coaching, Empirical research, Leadership studies, Psychology, Scale (ratio), Leadership development, Applied psychology, Leadership style

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
An Analysis of the Research Trends of Coaching Leadership — Research Paper | ScholarLens