2021Journal of Hydrologic EngineeringRequires access

Closed Formulas for Design of Combined Detention Ponds

José Anderson do Nascimento Batista

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Urban development leads to persistent increase in the number of detention ponds, mostly for flood control purposes. Adding a detention pond soon leads to the need for planning detention ponds over successive subbasins in a coordinated manner, which are here named combined detention ponds. This study analyzes these detention pond combinations using the rational method and kinematic wave routing for arbitrary climate, morphology, and surface conditions. Input and output hydrographs are obtained with three decision variables (downstream admissible flow, distance at the channel, and pond storage volume) and five dimensional parameters (intense rainfall formula exponent, return period, channel wave celerity, runoff coefficient, and basin area). The dimensionless variables and parameters allowed two closed formulas, one for a pond placed downstream in the same channel and the other for a pond also placed downstream, but in a channel’s tributary. The results demonstrate that both the distance between ponds in the same channel and the downstream pond storage can always be solved given the channel admissible flow, whereas a tributary pond can only be solved if the channel admissible flow increases downstream from the tributary. In both cases, the storage volume increases downstream by a factor of 2–5 depending on the channel’s distance from the upstream detention pond and on the upstream admissible flow. Because the peak of tributary outflow anticipates the peak of the lateral flow, tributary ponds are less sensitive to placement and need less storage volume, but the channel’s admissible flow must significantly increase downstream.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Urban development leads to persistent increase in the number of detention ponds, mostly for flood control purposes. Adding a detention pond soon leads to the need for planning detention ponds over successive subbasins in a coordinated manner, which are here named combined detention ponds. This study analyzes these detention pond combinations using the rational method and kinematic wave routing for arbitrary climate, morphology, and surface conditions. Input and output hydrographs are obtained with three decision variables (downstream admissible flow, distance at the channel, and pond storage volume) and five dimensional parameters (intense rainfall formula exponent, return period, channel wave celerity, runoff coefficient, and basin area). The dimensionless variables and parameters allowed two closed formulas, one for a pond placed downstream in the same channel and the other for a pond also placed downstream, but in a channel’s tributary. The results demonstrate that both the distance between ponds in the same channel and the downstream pond storage can always be solved given the channel admissible flow, whereas a tributary pond can only be solved if the channel admissible flow increases downstream from the tributary. In both cases, the storage volume increases downstream by a factor of 2–5 depending on the channel’s distance from the upstream detention pond and on the upstream admissible flow. Because the peak of tributary outflow anticipates the peak of the lateral flow, tributary ponds are less sensitive to placement and need less storage volume, but the channel’s admissible flow must significantly increase downstream.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Urban development leads to persistent increase in the number of detention ponds, mostly for flood control purposes. Adding a detention pond soon leads to the need for planning detention ponds over successive subbasins in a coordinated manner, which are here named combined detention ponds. This study analyzes these detention pond combinations using the rational method and kinematic wave routing for arbitrary climate, morphology, and surface conditions. Input and output hydrographs are obtained with three decision variables (downstream admissible flow, distance at the channel, and pond storage volume) and five dimensional parameters (intense rainfall formula exponent, return period, channel wave celerity, runoff coefficient, and basin area). The dimensionless variables and parameters allowed two closed formulas, one for a pond placed downstream in the same channel and the other for a pond also placed downstream, but in a channel’s tributary. The results demonstrate that both the distance between ponds in the same channel and the downstream pond storage can always be solved given the channel admissible flow, whereas a tributary pond can only be solved if the channel admissible flow increases downstream from the tributary. In both cases, the storage volume increases downstream by a factor of 2–5 depending on the channel’s distance from the upstream detention pond and on the upstream admissible flow. Because the peak of tributary outflow anticipates the peak of the lateral flow, tributary ponds are less sensitive to placement and need less storage volume, but the channel’s admissible flow must significantly increase downstream.

Key concepts: Tributary, Detention basin, Hydrograph, Channel (broadcasting), Environmental science, Hydrology (agriculture), Downstream (manufacturing), Routing (electronic design automation)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Closed Formulas for Design of Combined Detention Ponds — Research Paper | ScholarLens