2020E-LOGOSOpen access

New Styles of Reasoning in Contemporary Philosophy and Science

Jitka Paitlová

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The paper discusses the unexpected trends in the most modern forms of philosophy and science.The traditional differences in the roles of philosophy and science can be traced back to Kant: natural sciences refer to possible experience; philosophy as metaphysics does not affect experience at all.Today, there are very different trends.Some physical theories (such as string theory) have a highly theoretical character and cannot be proved by empirical experiments.A new approach has been developed in philosophy too: experimental philosophy, which makes use of empirical data to inform research on philosophical questions.Are these approaches just contradictions in terms or rather new styles of reasoning?The goal is not a deep analysis of x-phi or string theory but a reflection on the context between tradition and new trends in philosophy and science which are still rather marginal but may play an important role in the future.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The paper discusses the unexpected trends in the most modern forms of philosophy and science.The traditional differences in the roles of philosophy and science can be traced back to Kant: natural sciences refer to possible experience; philosophy as metaphysics does not affect experience at all.Today, there are very different trends.Some physical theories (such as string theory) have a highly theoretical character and cannot be proved by empirical experiments.A new approach has been developed in philosophy too: experimental philosophy, which makes use of empirical data to inform research on philosophical questions.Are these approaches just contradictions in terms or rather new styles of reasoning?The goal is not a deep analysis of x-phi or string theory but a reflection on the context between tradition and new trends in philosophy and science which are still rather marginal but may play an important role in the future.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The paper discusses the unexpected trends in the most modern forms of philosophy and science.The traditional differences in the roles of philosophy and science can be traced back to Kant: natural sciences refer to possible experience; philosophy as metaphysics does not affect experience at all.Today, there are very different trends.Some physical theories (such as string theory) have a highly theoretical character and cannot be proved by empirical experiments.A new approach has been developed in philosophy too: experimental philosophy, which makes use of empirical data to inform research on philosophical questions.Are these approaches just contradictions in terms or rather new styles of reasoning?The goal is not a deep analysis of x-phi or string theory but a reflection on the context between tradition and new trends in philosophy and science which are still rather marginal but may play an important role in the future.

Key concepts: Epistemology, Engineering ethics, Philosophy, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New Styles of Reasoning in Contemporary Philosophy and Science — Research Paper | ScholarLens