2015Unpublished venueRequires access

The end of ‘transitology’, the end of ‘post’-communism, the end…

Anca M. Pusca

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This conclusion presents some closing through on concepts discussed in this book. The end of &s;transitology&s;, as declared by many post-communist intellectuals, started in the early 2000s and is still going on. The end of &s;post&s;-communism marks the slow closing down of a window of critical reflection on communism. The book captures some of the interesting reflections that arose during this narrow window when the erasure of communism is not yet complete, when acts of resistance are still possible, when people still have something concrete/physical to hold on to, to remember, to confront. As former communist spaces are increasingly privatised and new architectures take their place, as film makers and artists are increasingly forced to focus on more global concerns in order to stay relevant, as spaces of resistance eventually give in to change and erasure, and bodies decay and eventually die along with the memories they carry, communism becomes history.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This conclusion presents some closing through on concepts discussed in this book. The end of &s;transitology&s;, as declared by many post-communist intellectuals, started in the early 2000s and is still going on. The end of &s;post&s;-communism marks the slow closing down of a window of critical reflection on communism. The book captures some of the interesting reflections that arose during this narrow window when the erasure of communism is not yet complete, when acts of resistance are still possible, when people still have something concrete/physical to hold on to, to remember, to confront. As former communist spaces are increasingly privatised and new architectures take their place, as film makers and artists are increasingly forced to focus on more global concerns in order to stay relevant, as spaces of resistance eventually give in to change and erasure, and bodies decay and eventually die along with the memories they carry, communism becomes history.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This conclusion presents some closing through on concepts discussed in this book. The end of &s;transitology&s;, as declared by many post-communist intellectuals, started in the early 2000s and is still going on. The end of &s;post&s;-communism marks the slow closing down of a window of critical reflection on communism. The book captures some of the interesting reflections that arose during this narrow window when the erasure of communism is not yet complete, when acts of resistance are still possible, when people still have something concrete/physical to hold on to, to remember, to confront. As former communist spaces are increasingly privatised and new architectures take their place, as film makers and artists are increasingly forced to focus on more global concerns in order to stay relevant, as spaces of resistance eventually give in to change and erasure, and bodies decay and eventually die along with the memories they carry, communism becomes history.

Key concepts: End of history, End-to-end principle, Dead end, End user, End milling, Computer science, Engineering, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The end of ‘transitology’, the end of ‘post’-communism, the end… — Research Paper | ScholarLens