2019프로그램북(구 초록집)Requires access

FCT 1-4 : Factors predicting recurrence after surgical treatment of ear keloid

Kihyuk Shin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: Auricles are common sites of keloid formation. Auricular keloid can occur not only to localize in auricles but also be one among keloids presented in several anatomic sites. However, there was no formal study that describe clinical comparison of auricular keloids between with and without lesions of another anatomical sites. Objectives: To compare clinical features of auricular keloid between with and without lesions of another anatomic sites Methods: Total of 61 patients who were diagnosed as auricular keloid and treated by surgical procedures in our clinic, between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two patient groups; Auricle-localized group (n=30) and auricle-combined group (n=31, group combined to auricles and another anatomic sites). Results: The median onset age was 35.5 years old and Fifty-six patients (92.3%) were women. Auricle-localized group showed significantly younger onset age, lesser number of lesions, lesser familial association, and lower recurrence rate than auricle-combined group (p < 0.05). The overall recurrence rate was 7.8 percent. Their recurrence rates were significantly different (4.5 percent in auricle-localized group versus 14.4 percent in auricle-combined group; p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study revealed that auricle-localized keloid showed better prognosis than auricular keloid with lesions of another anatomic sites.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Auricles are common sites of keloid formation. Auricular keloid can occur not only to localize in auricles but also be one among keloids presented in several anatomic sites. However, there was no formal study that describe clinical comparison of auricular keloids between with and without lesions of another anatomical sites. Objectives: To compare clinical features of auricular keloid between with and without lesions of another anatomic sites Methods: Total of 61 patients who were diagnosed as auricular keloid and treated by surgical procedures in our clinic, between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two patient groups; Auricle-localized group (n=30) and auricle-combined group (n=31, group combined to auricles and another anatomic sites). Results: The median onset age was 35.5 years old and Fifty-six patients (92.3%) were women. Auricle-localized group showed significantly younger onset age, lesser number of lesions, lesser familial association, and lower recurrence rate than auricle-combined group (p < 0.05). The overall recurrence rate was 7.8 percent. Their recurrence rates were significantly different (4.5 percent in auricle-localized group versus 14.4 percent in auricle-combined group; p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study revealed that auricle-localized keloid showed better prognosis than auricular keloid with lesions of another anatomic sites.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Auricles are common sites of keloid formation. Auricular keloid can occur not only to localize in auricles but also be one among keloids presented in several anatomic sites. However, there was no formal study that describe clinical comparison of auricular keloids between with and without lesions of another anatomical sites. Objectives: To compare clinical features of auricular keloid between with and without lesions of another anatomic sites Methods: Total of 61 patients who were diagnosed as auricular keloid and treated by surgical procedures in our clinic, between 2009 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into two patient groups; Auricle-localized group (n=30) and auricle-combined group (n=31, group combined to auricles and another anatomic sites). Results: The median onset age was 35.5 years old and Fifty-six patients (92.3%) were women. Auricle-localized group showed significantly younger onset age, lesser number of lesions, lesser familial association, and lower recurrence rate than auricle-combined group (p < 0.05). The overall recurrence rate was 7.8 percent. Their recurrence rates were significantly different (4.5 percent in auricle-localized group versus 14.4 percent in auricle-combined group; p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study revealed that auricle-localized keloid showed better prognosis than auricular keloid with lesions of another anatomic sites.

Key concepts: Auricle, Keloid, Medicine, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
FCT 1-4 : Factors predicting recurrence after surgical treatment of ear keloid — Research Paper | ScholarLens