2017Unpublished venueRequires access

Common-sense psychology and its implications

Richard Wilton, Trevor Harley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter describes the characteristics of common-sense explanations. It considers whether these explanations are of the same sort as those usually put forward in science, for example, in courses on cognition in psychology. In giving a common-sense explanation of a person&s;s behaviour, one refers to the person as being in a state such as having a particular belief or desire. These states are often called intentional states . Explanations that refer to intentional states differ in kind from explanations which refer solely to causes and effects: one damn thing after another, as some wit described it. The chapter argues that since representational accounts and intentional accounts are identical, then intentional accounts also are compatible with causal accounts of behaviour. It also proceeds to show that Tolman&s;s theory, and hence the common-sense intentional account, is compatible with an account of the animal&s;s behaviour that involves no reference to other states.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter describes the characteristics of common-sense explanations. It considers whether these explanations are of the same sort as those usually put forward in science, for example, in courses on cognition in psychology. In giving a common-sense explanation of a person&s;s behaviour, one refers to the person as being in a state such as having a particular belief or desire. These states are often called intentional states . Explanations that refer to intentional states differ in kind from explanations which refer solely to causes and effects: one damn thing after another, as some wit described it. The chapter argues that since representational accounts and intentional accounts are identical, then intentional accounts also are compatible with causal accounts of behaviour. It also proceeds to show that Tolman&s;s theory, and hence the common-sense intentional account, is compatible with an account of the animal&s;s behaviour that involves no reference to other states.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter describes the characteristics of common-sense explanations. It considers whether these explanations are of the same sort as those usually put forward in science, for example, in courses on cognition in psychology. In giving a common-sense explanation of a person&s;s behaviour, one refers to the person as being in a state such as having a particular belief or desire. These states are often called intentional states . Explanations that refer to intentional states differ in kind from explanations which refer solely to causes and effects: one damn thing after another, as some wit described it. The chapter argues that since representational accounts and intentional accounts are identical, then intentional accounts also are compatible with causal accounts of behaviour. It also proceeds to show that Tolman&s;s theory, and hence the common-sense intentional account, is compatible with an account of the animal&s;s behaviour that involves no reference to other states.

Key concepts: Psychology, Common sense, Epistemology, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Common-sense psychology and its implications — Research Paper | ScholarLens