Modeling of Slurry Bubble‐Column Reactors with Emphasis on the Importance of Bubble Size Estimation
Elham Dorostkar, Mohammad Hasan Khademi, Amir Rahimi
Abstract
Elham Dorostkar, Mohammad Hasan Khademi, Amir Rahimi
Abstract
Abstract A mathematical model entitled varying‐bubble model (V‐BM) was adapted to simulate a slurry bubble‐column reactor, operating in a churn‐turbulent regime, based on an axial‐dispersion model. This model was theoretically able to estimate the size of forming bubbles at the sparger, variations of each chemical species and catalyst concentration, pressure drop in both gas and liquid phases, change in size and rising velocity of bubbles, as well as gas holdup and specific gas‐liquid interfacial area along the reactor axis. A comparison between the V‐BM and single‐bubble model (S‐BM) indicates that the V‐BM is better compatible with the experimental data. The results demonstrate that the contribution of mass transfer is much more than the pressure drop in increasing the size of the bubble along the reactor.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract A mathematical model entitled varying‐bubble model (V‐BM) was adapted to simulate a slurry bubble‐column reactor, operating in a churn‐turbulent regime, based on an axial‐dispersion model. This model was theoretically able to estimate the size of forming bubbles at the sparger, variations of each chemical species and catalyst concentration, pressure drop in both gas and liquid phases, change in size and rising velocity of bubbles, as well as gas holdup and specific gas‐liquid interfacial area along the reactor axis. A comparison between the V‐BM and single‐bubble model (S‐BM) indicates that the V‐BM is better compatible with the experimental data. The results demonstrate that the contribution of mass transfer is much more than the pressure drop in increasing the size of the bubble along the reactor.
Key concepts: Bubble, Sparging, Slurry, Bubble column reactor, Pressure drop, Mechanics, Mass transfer, Turbulence