2018Unpublished venueRequires access

Frameworks for the economic appraisal of environmental projects

Ahmed Hussen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The chapter presents theoretical and practical considerations that are integral to the development of a methodological framework intended for the appraisal of environmental projects. After a succinct presentation of the welfare economic foundation of the standard cost–benefit analysis (CBA), the chapter examines in detail how the accounting (measurement) of costs, benefits, and discount factors varies between private and public (social) projects. It is evident that environmental projects contributing to long-term economic and social improvement are very sensitive to the full accounting of external costs and benefits; the choice of discount rate; and the nature of the flow of benefits and costs over the life time of the project. The chapter also explores alternative methods for the appraisal of environmental projects that can either supplement or, under certain circumstances, replace conventional cost–benefit analysis. These methods include the precautionary principle, environmental impact analysis, environmental risk assessment and risk management, as well as Rawlsian ethics and environmental justice. At the end of the chapter it is clear that the appraisal of environmental projects is both a science and an art, and mastering the latter is the real challenge.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The chapter presents theoretical and practical considerations that are integral to the development of a methodological framework intended for the appraisal of environmental projects. After a succinct presentation of the welfare economic foundation of the standard cost–benefit analysis (CBA), the chapter examines in detail how the accounting (measurement) of costs, benefits, and discount factors varies between private and public (social) projects. It is evident that environmental projects contributing to long-term economic and social improvement are very sensitive to the full accounting of external costs and benefits; the choice of discount rate; and the nature of the flow of benefits and costs over the life time of the project. The chapter also explores alternative methods for the appraisal of environmental projects that can either supplement or, under certain circumstances, replace conventional cost–benefit analysis. These methods include the precautionary principle, environmental impact analysis, environmental risk assessment and risk management, as well as Rawlsian ethics and environmental justice. At the end of the chapter it is clear that the appraisal of environmental projects is both a science and an art, and mastering the latter is the real challenge.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The chapter presents theoretical and practical considerations that are integral to the development of a methodological framework intended for the appraisal of environmental projects. After a succinct presentation of the welfare economic foundation of the standard cost–benefit analysis (CBA), the chapter examines in detail how the accounting (measurement) of costs, benefits, and discount factors varies between private and public (social) projects. It is evident that environmental projects contributing to long-term economic and social improvement are very sensitive to the full accounting of external costs and benefits; the choice of discount rate; and the nature of the flow of benefits and costs over the life time of the project. The chapter also explores alternative methods for the appraisal of environmental projects that can either supplement or, under certain circumstances, replace conventional cost–benefit analysis. These methods include the precautionary principle, environmental impact analysis, environmental risk assessment and risk management, as well as Rawlsian ethics and environmental justice. At the end of the chapter it is clear that the appraisal of environmental projects is both a science and an art, and mastering the latter is the real challenge.

Key concepts: Economic appraisal, Environmental planning, Environmental resource management, Project appraisal, Business, Geography, Environmental science, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Frameworks for the economic appraisal of environmental projects — Research Paper | ScholarLens