2020University of Twente Research InformationOpen access

Panel: Making a ‘practical turn’ in the philosophy of technology

Steven Dorrestijn, Wouter Eggink, Marijke Timmermans

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This panel contributes to making the so-called practical turn in the philosophy of technology. We coined this term for the mutual and constructive collaboration between philosophy of technology and design research. We see the practical turn as a variant and extension of the ‘empirical turn’ in the philosophy of technology. After the turn from abstract thinking on the essence of technology toward more empirical case studies about concrete technologies, the question we focus on is how philosophical reflection can become ‘practical’ by collaboration with design. Our practical turn compares to Constructive Technology Assessment, but our focus qua ‘assessment’ is on the philosophical side and qua ‘constructiveness’ it is on the design and engineering side of innovation. Interestingly there is also a counter-movement in philosophy of technology from ‘too much concreteness’ back to fundamental ethical evaluation. Our attempt is to be at the same time more practical as well as more philosophical. The panel brings together four research projects ‘practicing’ the practical turn. Together they explore the question of “how ethical-philosophical reflection about technology can be feedback to technology development” … and vice-versa, “how design practice can include and enrich philosophical reflection”.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This panel contributes to making the so-called practical turn in the philosophy of technology. We coined this term for the mutual and constructive collaboration between philosophy of technology and design research. We see the practical turn as a variant and extension of the ‘empirical turn’ in the philosophy of technology. After the turn from abstract thinking on the essence of technology toward more empirical case studies about concrete technologies, the question we focus on is how philosophical reflection can become ‘practical’ by collaboration with design. Our practical turn compares to Constructive Technology Assessment, but our focus qua ‘assessment’ is on the philosophical side and qua ‘constructiveness’ it is on the design and engineering side of innovation. Interestingly there is also a counter-movement in philosophy of technology from ‘too much concreteness’ back to fundamental ethical evaluation. Our attempt is to be at the same time more practical as well as more philosophical. The panel brings together four research projects ‘practicing’ the practical turn. Together they explore the question of “how ethical-philosophical reflection about technology can be feedback to technology development” … and vice-versa, “how design practice can include and enrich philosophical reflection”.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This panel contributes to making the so-called practical turn in the philosophy of technology. We coined this term for the mutual and constructive collaboration between philosophy of technology and design research. We see the practical turn as a variant and extension of the ‘empirical turn’ in the philosophy of technology. After the turn from abstract thinking on the essence of technology toward more empirical case studies about concrete technologies, the question we focus on is how philosophical reflection can become ‘practical’ by collaboration with design. Our practical turn compares to Constructive Technology Assessment, but our focus qua ‘assessment’ is on the philosophical side and qua ‘constructiveness’ it is on the design and engineering side of innovation. Interestingly there is also a counter-movement in philosophy of technology from ‘too much concreteness’ back to fundamental ethical evaluation. Our attempt is to be at the same time more practical as well as more philosophical. The panel brings together four research projects ‘practicing’ the practical turn. Together they explore the question of “how ethical-philosophical reflection about technology can be feedback to technology development” … and vice-versa, “how design practice can include and enrich philosophical reflection”.

Key concepts: Constructive, Philosophy of technology, Concreteness, Epistemology, Engineering ethics, Reflection (computer programming), Focus (optics), Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Panel: Making a ‘practical turn’ in the philosophy of technology — Research Paper | ScholarLens