2020•The Physics TeacherRequires access

Why the Concept of Potential Energy Must Be Frame Invariant

Eugene Hecht

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In recent years, there have been a number of articles published concerning whether or not potential energy (PE) as defined in mechanics is invariant under Galilean transformation. This essay addresses that issue in a different, more fundamental and elegant way than has been done thus far. It recognizes that a considerable change in the concept of PE has occurred over the last century, mostly as a result of both the special and general theories of relativity. We will show, by simple argument, that PE is Lorentz invariant, even if it is not a rigorously proper relativistic quantity. Although PE is an extremely important classical (i.e., pre-relativistic) theoretical device, it depends on the positions of the interacting bodies at any and every moment. Simply put, if the relative position of any constituent changes, the corresponding interactions must change instantly, and that violates special relativity. In general relativity, PE is not even a well-defined concept.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In recent years, there have been a number of articles published concerning whether or not potential energy (PE) as defined in mechanics is invariant under Galilean transformation. This essay addresses that issue in a different, more fundamental and elegant way than has been done thus far. It recognizes that a considerable change in the concept of PE has occurred over the last century, mostly as a result of both the special and general theories of relativity. We will show, by simple argument, that PE is Lorentz invariant, even if it is not a rigorously proper relativistic quantity. Although PE is an extremely important classical (i.e., pre-relativistic) theoretical device, it depends on the positions of the interacting bodies at any and every moment. Simply put, if the relative position of any constituent changes, the corresponding interactions must change instantly, and that violates special relativity. In general relativity, PE is not even a well-defined concept.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In recent years, there have been a number of articles published concerning whether or not potential energy (PE) as defined in mechanics is invariant under Galilean transformation. This essay addresses that issue in a different, more fundamental and elegant way than has been done thus far. It recognizes that a considerable change in the concept of PE has occurred over the last century, mostly as a result of both the special and general theories of relativity. We will show, by simple argument, that PE is Lorentz invariant, even if it is not a rigorously proper relativistic quantity. Although PE is an extremely important classical (i.e., pre-relativistic) theoretical device, it depends on the positions of the interacting bodies at any and every moment. Simply put, if the relative position of any constituent changes, the corresponding interactions must change instantly, and that violates special relativity. In general relativity, PE is not even a well-defined concept.

Key concepts: Principle of relativity, Theory of relativity, Relativistic mechanics, Invariant (physics), Test theories of special relativity, Four-force, Frame of reference, Special relativity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Why the Concept of Potential Energy Must Be Frame Invariant — Research Paper | ScholarLens