2012Unpublished venueRequires access

Urbanism as a way of life?

David Lee, Howard Newby

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

So rapid and so widespread were the changes that the temptation to analyse society in ‘now-and-then’ terms was irresistible. As a consequence the present was constantly being contrasted with the past in the belief that what was occurring ‘now’ was quite unique and completely different from ‘then’—that is, before the advent of the Industrial and Democratic Revolutions. Almost all nineteenth-century sociological theorists succumbed to viewing social change in terms of what Nisbet has called ‘linked antitheses’— contrasting pairs of concepts, one of which is applied to society before the transformation and the other applied to the subsequent era.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

So rapid and so widespread were the changes that the temptation to analyse society in ‘now-and-then’ terms was irresistible. As a consequence the present was constantly being contrasted with the past in the belief that what was occurring ‘now’ was quite unique and completely different from ‘then’—that is, before the advent of the Industrial and Democratic Revolutions. Almost all nineteenth-century sociological theorists succumbed to viewing social change in terms of what Nisbet has called ‘linked antitheses’— contrasting pairs of concepts, one of which is applied to society before the transformation and the other applied to the subsequent era.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

So rapid and so widespread were the changes that the temptation to analyse society in ‘now-and-then’ terms was irresistible. As a consequence the present was constantly being contrasted with the past in the belief that what was occurring ‘now’ was quite unique and completely different from ‘then’—that is, before the advent of the Industrial and Democratic Revolutions. Almost all nineteenth-century sociological theorists succumbed to viewing social change in terms of what Nisbet has called ‘linked antitheses’— contrasting pairs of concepts, one of which is applied to society before the transformation and the other applied to the subsequent era.

Key concepts: Urbanism, Aesthetics, Sociology, Art, Visual arts, Architecture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Urbanism as a way of life? — Research Paper | ScholarLens