2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Energy and protein requirements*

Arnold Pacey, Philip Payne

Open publisher page 2,550 citations

Abstract

The conventional method of analysing food energy requirements, according to T. B. Wood and J. W. Capstick, partitions the energy expenditure of an animal into three separate components: maintenance, growth, and activity. Two kinds of statement are commonly made about the amount of food which people need. Firstly, figures are quoted for quantities of nutrients which could safely be recommended for practically all individuals, even though they may be living under a wide variety of situations. Secondly, however, estimates are sometimes quoted for minimum physiological requirements, that is, levels of intake below which there is an increasing probability that some specified symptom of deficiency will appear. The concept of an adaptive, self-regulating system implies some type of negative feedback response by which the body is able in part to cancel out changes in inputs and outputs, and maintain the internal state near its original condition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The conventional method of analysing food energy requirements, according to T. B. Wood and J. W. Capstick, partitions the energy expenditure of an animal into three separate components: maintenance, growth, and activity. Two kinds of statement are commonly made about the amount of food which people need. Firstly, figures are quoted for quantities of nutrients which could safely be recommended for practically all individuals, even though they may be living under a wide variety of situations. Secondly, however, estimates are sometimes quoted for minimum physiological requirements, that is, levels of intake below which there is an increasing probability that some specified symptom of deficiency will appear. The concept of an adaptive, self-regulating system implies some type of negative feedback response by which the body is able in part to cancel out changes in inputs and outputs, and maintain the internal state near its original condition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2550 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The conventional method of analysing food energy requirements, according to T. B. Wood and J. W. Capstick, partitions the energy expenditure of an animal into three separate components: maintenance, growth, and activity. Two kinds of statement are commonly made about the amount of food which people need. Firstly, figures are quoted for quantities of nutrients which could safely be recommended for practically all individuals, even though they may be living under a wide variety of situations. Secondly, however, estimates are sometimes quoted for minimum physiological requirements, that is, levels of intake below which there is an increasing probability that some specified symptom of deficiency will appear. The concept of an adaptive, self-regulating system implies some type of negative feedback response by which the body is able in part to cancel out changes in inputs and outputs, and maintain the internal state near its original condition.

Key concepts: Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Energy and protein requirements* — Research Paper | ScholarLens