2019•Minerva Access (University of Melbourne)Open access

The Concept of Public Participation: Planning and Housing Resumption Decisions in Shanghai

Sarah Biddulph

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines public participation in government decision making in China. Despite superficial similarities to Archon Fung, Mary Graham, and David Weil’s vision of an emerging form of consultative transparency (where the public is able to access information from the government, organizations, and other sources, combines that information independently of government intervention, and plays an active role in influencing policy formation), the role of public consultation in China is arguably much more constrained. When we seek to understand the role of, and possibilities for, public participation and transparency in authoritarian regimes such as China, we simply cannot assume that public participation, transparency, and democratic legitimation exist in the same relationship to each other.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines public participation in government decision making in China. Despite superficial similarities to Archon Fung, Mary Graham, and David Weil’s vision of an emerging form of consultative transparency (where the public is able to access information from the government, organizations, and other sources, combines that information independently of government intervention, and plays an active role in influencing policy formation), the role of public consultation in China is arguably much more constrained. When we seek to understand the role of, and possibilities for, public participation and transparency in authoritarian regimes such as China, we simply cannot assume that public participation, transparency, and democratic legitimation exist in the same relationship to each other.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines public participation in government decision making in China. Despite superficial similarities to Archon Fung, Mary Graham, and David Weil’s vision of an emerging form of consultative transparency (where the public is able to access information from the government, organizations, and other sources, combines that information independently of government intervention, and plays an active role in influencing policy formation), the role of public consultation in China is arguably much more constrained. When we seek to understand the role of, and possibilities for, public participation and transparency in authoritarian regimes such as China, we simply cannot assume that public participation, transparency, and democratic legitimation exist in the same relationship to each other.

Key concepts: Transparency (behavior), Legitimation, Authoritarianism, China, Public administration, Government (linguistics), Democracy, Public participation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Concept of Public Participation: Planning and Housing Resumption Decisions in Shanghai — Research Paper | ScholarLens