2012The Bovine PractitionerOpen access

Comparison of tilmicosin to gamithromycin for on arrival treatment of bovine respiratory disease in feeder steers

Joyce Van Donkersgoed, John K. Merrill

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

A trial was conducted in a commercial feedlot in western Canada using fall-placed feedlot calves at moderate risk of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) to compare the efficacy of gamithromycin to tilmicosin for metaphylactic treatment of BRD. First-pull treatment rates for BRD were significantly lower (P=0.01) in calves in the gamithromycin group than in the tilmicosin group. There were no other significant differences in health or performance between the two groups. The 6.6 percentage point difference in treatment rates for BRD equated to a net advantage of $0.03 CAN/head for those calves given gamithromycin as a metaphylactic drug on arrival compared to metaphylactic treatment with tilmicosin. Drug cost and disease risk should be carefully evaluated in each feedlot and group of incoming cattle to determine the most cost-effective metaphylaxis protocol.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A trial was conducted in a commercial feedlot in western Canada using fall-placed feedlot calves at moderate risk of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) to compare the efficacy of gamithromycin to tilmicosin for metaphylactic treatment of BRD. First-pull treatment rates for BRD were significantly lower (P=0.01) in calves in the gamithromycin group than in the tilmicosin group. There were no other significant differences in health or performance between the two groups. The 6.6 percentage point difference in treatment rates for BRD equated to a net advantage of $0.03 CAN/head for those calves given gamithromycin as a metaphylactic drug on arrival compared to metaphylactic treatment with tilmicosin. Drug cost and disease risk should be carefully evaluated in each feedlot and group of incoming cattle to determine the most cost-effective metaphylaxis protocol.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A trial was conducted in a commercial feedlot in western Canada using fall-placed feedlot calves at moderate risk of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) to compare the efficacy of gamithromycin to tilmicosin for metaphylactic treatment of BRD. First-pull treatment rates for BRD were significantly lower (P=0.01) in calves in the gamithromycin group than in the tilmicosin group. There were no other significant differences in health or performance between the two groups. The 6.6 percentage point difference in treatment rates for BRD equated to a net advantage of $0.03 CAN/head for those calves given gamithromycin as a metaphylactic drug on arrival compared to metaphylactic treatment with tilmicosin. Drug cost and disease risk should be carefully evaluated in each feedlot and group of incoming cattle to determine the most cost-effective metaphylaxis protocol.

Key concepts: Tilmicosin, Bovine respiratory disease, Feedlot, Medicine, Feeder cattle, Veterinary medicine, Animal science, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of tilmicosin to gamithromycin for on arrival treatment of bovine respiratory disease in feeder steers — Research Paper | ScholarLens