2020Unpublished venueRequires access

Feminist Science for the People

Sara Giordano

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

In this chapter, I trace the emergence of academic and policy work on “public understandings of science” and “science literacy” over the course of the last several decades alongside feminist and other critical approaches to the broader topic of democratic sciences. I argue that we must understand the historic epistemic authority of dominant sciences as well as the impact of on-the-ground activist movements of the 1960s and 70s which challenged that authority to evaluate claims for more democratic science in this moment. By doing this genealogical work, we might be better prepared to assess various attempts at democratic science rather than assuming all movements toward increased participation in sciences are universally beneficial to society as a whole. Instead, I argue for the need to expand and challenge the definition of science itself, making room for challenges to scientific authority through participation and democratization, as well as refusal to participate and science illiteracy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this chapter, I trace the emergence of academic and policy work on “public understandings of science” and “science literacy” over the course of the last several decades alongside feminist and other critical approaches to the broader topic of democratic sciences. I argue that we must understand the historic epistemic authority of dominant sciences as well as the impact of on-the-ground activist movements of the 1960s and 70s which challenged that authority to evaluate claims for more democratic science in this moment. By doing this genealogical work, we might be better prepared to assess various attempts at democratic science rather than assuming all movements toward increased participation in sciences are universally beneficial to society as a whole. Instead, I argue for the need to expand and challenge the definition of science itself, making room for challenges to scientific authority through participation and democratization, as well as refusal to participate and science illiteracy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this chapter, I trace the emergence of academic and policy work on “public understandings of science” and “science literacy” over the course of the last several decades alongside feminist and other critical approaches to the broader topic of democratic sciences. I argue that we must understand the historic epistemic authority of dominant sciences as well as the impact of on-the-ground activist movements of the 1960s and 70s which challenged that authority to evaluate claims for more democratic science in this moment. By doing this genealogical work, we might be better prepared to assess various attempts at democratic science rather than assuming all movements toward increased participation in sciences are universally beneficial to society as a whole. Instead, I argue for the need to expand and challenge the definition of science itself, making room for challenges to scientific authority through participation and democratization, as well as refusal to participate and science illiteracy.

Key concepts: Sociology, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feminist Science for the People — Research Paper | ScholarLens