2014Unpublished venueRequires access

속격 표현과 지시성: 프랑스어와 한국어를 중심으로

박정섭

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

I follow Curat(1999) and others, in supposing a French referential noun comes with a visible determiner unless it is in direct contact with its referent in disourse or the determiner is phonetically deleted (but remains in an invisible form). As a consequence, then, in a French genitive construction “N1 de N2”, N2, coming with no visible determiner, should be either non-referential or with an invisible determiner. I examine various cases of N2 without a visible determiner in the French genitive and compare them with the Korean genitive “N2(-uy) N1”. Showing that the Korean genitive marker “uy” is incompatible with non-referential noun, I conclude it should be analized as the amalgamed form of D and K, its two basic features being related with “reference” and “case”.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I follow Curat(1999) and others, in supposing a French referential noun comes with a visible determiner unless it is in direct contact with its referent in disourse or the determiner is phonetically deleted (but remains in an invisible form). As a consequence, then, in a French genitive construction “N1 de N2”, N2, coming with no visible determiner, should be either non-referential or with an invisible determiner. I examine various cases of N2 without a visible determiner in the French genitive and compare them with the Korean genitive “N2(-uy) N1”. Showing that the Korean genitive marker “uy” is incompatible with non-referential noun, I conclude it should be analized as the amalgamed form of D and K, its two basic features being related with “reference” and “case”.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I follow Curat(1999) and others, in supposing a French referential noun comes with a visible determiner unless it is in direct contact with its referent in disourse or the determiner is phonetically deleted (but remains in an invisible form). As a consequence, then, in a French genitive construction “N1 de N2”, N2, coming with no visible determiner, should be either non-referential or with an invisible determiner. I examine various cases of N2 without a visible determiner in the French genitive and compare them with the Korean genitive “N2(-uy) N1”. Showing that the Korean genitive marker “uy” is incompatible with non-referential noun, I conclude it should be analized as the amalgamed form of D and K, its two basic features being related with “reference” and “case”.

Key concepts: Determiner, Genitive case, Referent, Linguistics, Noun, Demonstrative, Definiteness, Noun phrase

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
속격 표현과 지시성: 프랑스어와 한국어를 중심으로 — Research Paper | ScholarLens