2020North American Journal of Fisheries ManagementRequires access

Use of Gizzard Diameter to Estimate Weight and Length of Partly Digested Gizzard Shad in Piscivore Diets

Daniel E. Shoup, Jeff B. Tibbits, Clayton P. Porter, Richard A. Snow, Michael J. Porta

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Abstract In diet studies, stomach contents from predatory fish may be difficult to identify due to digestion. The Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepedianum is an important prey species for sport fish; thus, determining the size of ingested shad can assist with evaluating competitive interactions, bioenergetic patterns, and niche partitioning and can add precision to predictive models. The gizzard organ of clupeids appears to be more resistant to digestion compared to other tissues and can often be found in the stomachs of predatory fish after other tissues from Gizzard Shad are digested. If the gizzard diameter is proportional to Gizzard Shad weight or length, it could be a useful structure for estimating the size of partially digested Gizzard Shad when other structures that are traditionally used to estimate weight or length (e.g., backbones) are damaged due to advanced digestion. For this reason, we evaluated the allometry relating gizzard diameter and Gizzard Shad weight and TL. We sampled a total of 936 Gizzard Shad from nine Oklahoma reservoirs. Fish were frozen and later thawed; they were measured for weight (±0.01 g) and TL (±1 mm), and the gizzard was then removed. Gizzard diameter was measured (±0.1 mm) at its widest point using calipers. Eight different equations were evaluated to find the best relationship (lowest Akaike’s information criterion) between gizzard diameter and weight or length. The relationship between gizzard diameter and fish weight was best modeled as a second-order polynomial, whereas the relationship between gizzard diameter and fish TL was best described by a five-parameter Richard’s equation. Both relationships explained over 80% of the variation in Gizzard Shad size. The 95% CIs for weight (±4–7%) and TL (±2–7%) indicated good overall precision for mean fish size based on gizzard diameter. Therefore, we recommend using gizzard diameter to determine weight and TL from diet samples when advanced digestion of Gizzard Shad limits the use of more traditional metrics (TL, backbone length, etc.).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In diet studies, stomach contents from predatory fish may be difficult to identify due to digestion. The Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepedianum is an important prey species for sport fish; thus, determining the size of ingested shad can assist with evaluating competitive interactions, bioenergetic patterns, and niche partitioning and can add precision to predictive models. The gizzard organ of clupeids appears to be more resistant to digestion compared to other tissues and can often be found in the stomachs of predatory fish after other tissues from Gizzard Shad are digested. If the gizzard diameter is proportional to Gizzard Shad weight or length, it could be a useful structure for estimating the size of partially digested Gizzard Shad when other structures that are traditionally used to estimate weight or length (e.g., backbones) are damaged due to advanced digestion. For this reason, we evaluated the allometry relating gizzard diameter and Gizzard Shad weight and TL. We sampled a total of 936 Gizzard Shad from nine Oklahoma reservoirs. Fish were frozen and later thawed; they were measured for weight (±0.01 g) and TL (±1 mm), and the gizzard was then removed. Gizzard diameter was measured (±0.1 mm) at its widest point using calipers. Eight different equations were evaluated to find the best relationship (lowest Akaike’s information criterion) between gizzard diameter and weight or length. The relationship between gizzard diameter and fish weight was best modeled as a second-order polynomial, whereas the relationship between gizzard diameter and fish TL was best described by a five-parameter Richard’s equation. Both relationships explained over 80% of the variation in Gizzard Shad size. The 95% CIs for weight (±4–7%) and TL (±2–7%) indicated good overall precision for mean fish size based on gizzard diameter. Therefore, we recommend using gizzard diameter to determine weight and TL from diet samples when advanced digestion of Gizzard Shad limits the use of more traditional metrics (TL, backbone length, etc.).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In diet studies, stomach contents from predatory fish may be difficult to identify due to digestion. The Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepedianum is an important prey species for sport fish; thus, determining the size of ingested shad can assist with evaluating competitive interactions, bioenergetic patterns, and niche partitioning and can add precision to predictive models. The gizzard organ of clupeids appears to be more resistant to digestion compared to other tissues and can often be found in the stomachs of predatory fish after other tissues from Gizzard Shad are digested. If the gizzard diameter is proportional to Gizzard Shad weight or length, it could be a useful structure for estimating the size of partially digested Gizzard Shad when other structures that are traditionally used to estimate weight or length (e.g., backbones) are damaged due to advanced digestion. For this reason, we evaluated the allometry relating gizzard diameter and Gizzard Shad weight and TL. We sampled a total of 936 Gizzard Shad from nine Oklahoma reservoirs. Fish were frozen and later thawed; they were measured for weight (±0.01 g) and TL (±1 mm), and the gizzard was then removed. Gizzard diameter was measured (±0.1 mm) at its widest point using calipers. Eight different equations were evaluated to find the best relationship (lowest Akaike’s information criterion) between gizzard diameter and weight or length. The relationship between gizzard diameter and fish weight was best modeled as a second-order polynomial, whereas the relationship between gizzard diameter and fish TL was best described by a five-parameter Richard’s equation. Both relationships explained over 80% of the variation in Gizzard Shad size. The 95% CIs for weight (±4–7%) and TL (±2–7%) indicated good overall precision for mean fish size based on gizzard diameter. Therefore, we recommend using gizzard diameter to determine weight and TL from diet samples when advanced digestion of Gizzard Shad limits the use of more traditional metrics (TL, backbone length, etc.).

Key concepts: Gizzard shad, Dorosoma, Gizzard, Biology, Fishery, Animal science, Anatomy, Fish <Actinopterygii>

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of Gizzard Diameter to Estimate Weight and Length of Partly Digested Gizzard Shad in Piscivore Diets — Research Paper | ScholarLens