College Students on Their Stress and Coping: Complexities and Dynamics
Jacqueline Zara Scherr
Abstract
Jacqueline Zara Scherr
Abstract
Today’s college students are experiencing a considerable amount of stressors. Three studies ex-plored the reported stress and coping process in college students. Study 1 investigated the strength of sleep, well-being, and affect as predictors of stress. Studies 2 and 3 examined students’ general coping habits and perceptions of coping mechanisms, as well as their own coping process throughout three self-described stressful events. Study 1 results suggest affect as a strong predictor and sleep and well-being as weaker predictors of stress. Studies 2 and 3 results suggest similarities in students’ general exposure to stressors and coping habits but individual differences in students’ own coping processes and perceptions of coping mechanisms. Further, results suggest the dichot-omous nature of coping categorizations (i.e., problem vs emotion-focused, situational vs. disposi-tional) may be too simplified. Rather, coping is an idiosyncratic process with multiple layers. Theo-retical and practical implications are discussed along with limitations and future directions.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Today’s college students are experiencing a considerable amount of stressors. Three studies ex-plored the reported stress and coping process in college students. Study 1 investigated the strength of sleep, well-being, and affect as predictors of stress. Studies 2 and 3 examined students’ general coping habits and perceptions of coping mechanisms, as well as their own coping process throughout three self-described stressful events. Study 1 results suggest affect as a strong predictor and sleep and well-being as weaker predictors of stress. Studies 2 and 3 results suggest similarities in students’ general exposure to stressors and coping habits but individual differences in students’ own coping processes and perceptions of coping mechanisms. Further, results suggest the dichot-omous nature of coping categorizations (i.e., problem vs emotion-focused, situational vs. disposi-tional) may be too simplified. Rather, coping is an idiosyncratic process with multiple layers. Theo-retical and practical implications are discussed along with limitations and future directions.
Key concepts: Coping (psychology), Stress (linguistics), Psychology, Mathematics education, Social psychology, Clinical psychology, Linguistics, Philosophy