2009•BYU Law Library (Brigham Young University)Open access

Protecting the Appropriations Power: Why Congress Should Care about Settlements at the Department of Justice

Todd David Peterson

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, and the subsequent presidentially declared war on terror, 1 the President and the executive branch assumed new powers to respond to the perceived terrorist threat.Some of these powers, like those granted by the Patriot Act 2 and the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, 3 were granted by Congress.Other authority, such as the power to authorize the National Security Agency ("NSA") to conduct warrantless wiretaps on American citizens 4 and the power to use coercive interrogation techniques 5 were assumed by the President without any congressional authorization.The President took these actions in accordance with secret legal opinions issued by the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel ("OLC").6 The OLC memoranda supported a conception of the President's

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, and the subsequent presidentially declared war on terror, 1 the President and the executive branch assumed new powers to respond to the perceived terrorist threat.Some of these powers, like those granted by the Patriot Act 2 and the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, 3 were granted by Congress.Other authority, such as the power to authorize the National Security Agency ("NSA") to conduct warrantless wiretaps on American citizens 4 and the power to use coercive interrogation techniques 5 were assumed by the President without any congressional authorization.The President took these actions in accordance with secret legal opinions issued by the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel ("OLC").6 The OLC memoranda supported a conception of the President's

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, and the subsequent presidentially declared war on terror, 1 the President and the executive branch assumed new powers to respond to the perceived terrorist threat.Some of these powers, like those granted by the Patriot Act 2 and the Authorization for the Use of Military Force, 3 were granted by Congress.Other authority, such as the power to authorize the National Security Agency ("NSA") to conduct warrantless wiretaps on American citizens 4 and the power to use coercive interrogation techniques 5 were assumed by the President without any congressional authorization.The President took these actions in accordance with secret legal opinions issued by the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel ("OLC").6 The OLC memoranda supported a conception of the President's

Key concepts: Law, Presidential system, Subpoena, Political science, Interrogation, Memorandum, Power (physics), Economic Justice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Protecting the Appropriations Power: Why Congress Should Care about Settlements at the Department of Justice — Research Paper | ScholarLens