2020Unpublished venueRequires access

MaxillaryDistractionOsteogenesisincleft palate patients

Baumann

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Conventional orthognathic surgery, such as Le Fort I osteotomy, is often performed for correction of maxillary hypoplasia. An alternative intervention is distraction ostoegenesis, which achieves bone lengthening by gradual mechanical distraction.Twenty patients with maxilla hypoplasia were treated with fixed orthodontic appliances and an intraoral distraction device during the last 15 years. Lateral cephalograms were obtained one day after insertion of the distractor, at the end of distraction, after removal, and one year after removal of the distractor.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conventional orthognathic surgery, such as Le Fort I osteotomy, is often performed for correction of maxillary hypoplasia. An alternative intervention is distraction ostoegenesis, which achieves bone lengthening by gradual mechanical distraction.Twenty patients with maxilla hypoplasia were treated with fixed orthodontic appliances and an intraoral distraction device during the last 15 years. Lateral cephalograms were obtained one day after insertion of the distractor, at the end of distraction, after removal, and one year after removal of the distractor.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conventional orthognathic surgery, such as Le Fort I osteotomy, is often performed for correction of maxillary hypoplasia. An alternative intervention is distraction ostoegenesis, which achieves bone lengthening by gradual mechanical distraction.Twenty patients with maxilla hypoplasia were treated with fixed orthodontic appliances and an intraoral distraction device during the last 15 years. Lateral cephalograms were obtained one day after insertion of the distractor, at the end of distraction, after removal, and one year after removal of the distractor.

Key concepts: Distraction, Maxillary hypoplasia, Medicine, Maxilla, Hypoplasia, Osteotomy, Distraction osteogenesis, Orthognathic surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MaxillaryDistractionOsteogenesisincleft palate patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens