Influence of Neptune’s Migration Parameters on the Inclination Distribution of Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs)
David Nesvorný
Abstract
David Nesvorný
Abstract
Abstract Nesvorný suggested that Neptune’s early migration must have been slow (one e-fold τ ≳ 10 Myr) to explain the wide inclination distribution of dynamically hot populations in the Kuiper Belt. Volk & Malhotra reported that the median inclination of implanted KBOs, i M, depends on Neptune’s orbital inclination during migration. They did not find any simple relationship between i M and τ for 5 ≤ τ ≤ 50 Myr (very short migration timescales τ < 5 Myr can be ruled out; e.g., Figure 2 in Nesvorný). Here we briefly explain—a full account of our research will be published elsewhere—how these seemingly contradictory findings can be reconciled.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Nesvorný suggested that Neptune’s early migration must have been slow (one e-fold τ ≳ 10 Myr) to explain the wide inclination distribution of dynamically hot populations in the Kuiper Belt. Volk & Malhotra reported that the median inclination of implanted KBOs, i M, depends on Neptune’s orbital inclination during migration. They did not find any simple relationship between i M and τ for 5 ≤ τ ≤ 50 Myr (very short migration timescales τ < 5 Myr can be ruled out; e.g., Figure 2 in Nesvorný). Here we briefly explain—a full account of our research will be published elsewhere—how these seemingly contradictory findings can be reconciled.
Key concepts: Neptune, Nice model, Physics, myr, Geology, Astronomy, Astrophysics, Planet