2020•CureusOpen access

Importance of the Hounsfield Unit Value Measured by Computed Tomography in the Differentiation of Hydronephrosis and Pyonephrosis

Abdullah Erdoğan, Murat Şambel, Volkan Çağlayan, Sinan Avcı

Open full text 13 citations

Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of the non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCECT) renal pelvis Hounsfield unit (HU) values in differentiating between the hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis in dilated urinary systems. Materials and methods Patients who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (PN) due to urinary system obstruction in the last three years were retrospectively evaluated. Pyonephrosis and hydronephrosis groups were differentiated according to the clarity of percutaneous needle aspiration. The patients’ renal pelvic anteroposterior (AP) diameter, renal pelvic area, and mean HU values were measured on NCECT and compared between two groups. Results PN was performed on a total of 523 patients. The study included 159 patients and 214 renal units. Hydronephrosis was detected in 176 renal units and pyonephrosis in 38 renal units. No statistically significant difference was observed between the measured AP diameter and renal pelvic area in the two groups (28.45 ± 10.1 mm vs. 31.13 ± 14.4 mm, p = 0.36 and 658.51 ± 433.1 mm2 vs. 755.14 ± 470.6 mm2, p = 0.22, respectively). The mean HU value of the pyonephrosis group was significantly higher (2.30 ± 5.02 vs. 10.97 ± 6.68, p < 0.001). At the cut-off value of 8.46, HU had a sensitivity of 68.4% and specificity of 92.6% in the diagnosis of pyonephrosis. Conclusions It is possible to determine differential diagnosis between pyonephrosis and hydronephrosis easily and without additional cost by performing dilated renal pelvis HU measurements on NCECT.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of the non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCECT) renal pelvis Hounsfield unit (HU) values in differentiating between the hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis in dilated urinary systems. Materials and methods Patients who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (PN) due to urinary system obstruction in the last three years were retrospectively evaluated. Pyonephrosis and hydronephrosis groups were differentiated according to the clarity of percutaneous needle aspiration. The patients’ renal pelvic anteroposterior (AP) diameter, renal pelvic area, and mean HU values were measured on NCECT and compared between two groups. Results PN was performed on a total of 523 patients. The study included 159 patients and 214 renal units. Hydronephrosis was detected in 176 renal units and pyonephrosis in 38 renal units. No statistically significant difference was observed between the measured AP diameter and renal pelvic area in the two groups (28.45 ± 10.1 mm vs. 31.13 ± 14.4 mm, p = 0.36 and 658.51 ± 433.1 mm2 vs. 755.14 ± 470.6 mm2, p = 0.22, respectively). The mean HU value of the pyonephrosis group was significantly higher (2.30 ± 5.02 vs. 10.97 ± 6.68, p < 0.001). At the cut-off value of 8.46, HU had a sensitivity of 68.4% and specificity of 92.6% in the diagnosis of pyonephrosis. Conclusions It is possible to determine differential diagnosis between pyonephrosis and hydronephrosis easily and without additional cost by performing dilated renal pelvis HU measurements on NCECT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of the non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCECT) renal pelvis Hounsfield unit (HU) values in differentiating between the hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis in dilated urinary systems. Materials and methods Patients who underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (PN) due to urinary system obstruction in the last three years were retrospectively evaluated. Pyonephrosis and hydronephrosis groups were differentiated according to the clarity of percutaneous needle aspiration. The patients’ renal pelvic anteroposterior (AP) diameter, renal pelvic area, and mean HU values were measured on NCECT and compared between two groups. Results PN was performed on a total of 523 patients. The study included 159 patients and 214 renal units. Hydronephrosis was detected in 176 renal units and pyonephrosis in 38 renal units. No statistically significant difference was observed between the measured AP diameter and renal pelvic area in the two groups (28.45 ± 10.1 mm vs. 31.13 ± 14.4 mm, p = 0.36 and 658.51 ± 433.1 mm2 vs. 755.14 ± 470.6 mm2, p = 0.22, respectively). The mean HU value of the pyonephrosis group was significantly higher (2.30 ± 5.02 vs. 10.97 ± 6.68, p < 0.001). At the cut-off value of 8.46, HU had a sensitivity of 68.4% and specificity of 92.6% in the diagnosis of pyonephrosis. Conclusions It is possible to determine differential diagnosis between pyonephrosis and hydronephrosis easily and without additional cost by performing dilated renal pelvis HU measurements on NCECT.

Key concepts: Pyonephrosis, Medicine, Hydronephrosis, Hounsfield scale, Renal pelvis, Nephrostomy, Pelvis, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Importance of the Hounsfield Unit Value Measured by Computed Tomography in the Differentiation of Hydronephrosis and Pyonephrosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens