2016•Unpublished venueRequires access

Torus quotients as global quotients by finite groups

Anton Geraschenko, Matthew Satriano

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

This article is motivated by the following local-to-global question: is every variety with tame quotient singularities globally the quotient of a smooth variety by a finite group? We show that this question has a positive answer for all quasi-projective varieties which are expressible as a quotient of a smooth variety by a split torus (e.g. simplicial toric varieties). Although simplicial toric varieties are rarely toric quotients of smooth varieties by finite groups, we give an explicit procedure for constructing the quotient structure using toric techniques. This result follow from a characterization of varieties which are expressible as the quotient of a smooth variety by a split torus. As an additional application of this characterization, we show that a variety with abelian quotient singularities may fail to be a quotient of a smooth variety by a finite abelian group. Concretely, we show that $\mathbb{P}^2/A_5$ is not expressible as a quotient of a smooth variety by a finite abelian group.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article is motivated by the following local-to-global question: is every variety with tame quotient singularities globally the quotient of a smooth variety by a finite group? We show that this question has a positive answer for all quasi-projective varieties which are expressible as a quotient of a smooth variety by a split torus (e.g. simplicial toric varieties). Although simplicial toric varieties are rarely toric quotients of smooth varieties by finite groups, we give an explicit procedure for constructing the quotient structure using toric techniques. This result follow from a characterization of varieties which are expressible as the quotient of a smooth variety by a split torus. As an additional application of this characterization, we show that a variety with abelian quotient singularities may fail to be a quotient of a smooth variety by a finite abelian group. Concretely, we show that $\mathbb{P}^2/A_5$ is not expressible as a quotient of a smooth variety by a finite abelian group.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article is motivated by the following local-to-global question: is every variety with tame quotient singularities globally the quotient of a smooth variety by a finite group? We show that this question has a positive answer for all quasi-projective varieties which are expressible as a quotient of a smooth variety by a split torus (e.g. simplicial toric varieties). Although simplicial toric varieties are rarely toric quotients of smooth varieties by finite groups, we give an explicit procedure for constructing the quotient structure using toric techniques. This result follow from a characterization of varieties which are expressible as the quotient of a smooth variety by a split torus. As an additional application of this characterization, we show that a variety with abelian quotient singularities may fail to be a quotient of a smooth variety by a finite abelian group. Concretely, we show that $\mathbb{P}^2/A_5$ is not expressible as a quotient of a smooth variety by a finite abelian group.

Key concepts: Quotient, Toric variety, Mathematics, Variety (cybernetics), Pure mathematics, Abelian group, Torus, Gravitational singularity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Torus quotients as global quotients by finite groups — Research Paper | ScholarLens