2014•Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Open access

Reversals of the solar magnetic dipole in the light of\n observational data and simple dynamo models

Valery V. Pipin, David L. Moss, Dmitry D. Sokoloff, J. T. Hoeksema

Open full text 12 citations

Abstract

\n Context. Observations show that the photospheric solar magnetic dipole\n usually does not vanish during the reversal of the solar magnetic field, which occurs in\n each solar cycle. In contrast, mean-field solar dynamo models predict that the dipole\n field does become zero. In a recent paper it was suggested that this contradiction could\n be explained as a large-scale manifestation of small-scale magnetic fluctuations of the\n surface poloidal field.\n Aims. Our aim is to confront this interpretation with the available\n observational data.\n Methods. Here we compare this interpretation with Wilcox Solar\n Observatory (WSO) photospheric magnetic field data in order to determine the amplitude of\n magnetic fluctuations required to explain the phenomenon and to compare the results with\n predictions from a simple dynamo model which takes these fluctuations into account.\n Results. We demonstrate that the WSO data concerning the magnetic dipole\n reversals are very similar to the predictions from our very simple solar dynamo model,\n which includes both mean magnetic field and fluctuations. The ratio between the rms value\n of the magnetic fluctuations and the mean field is estimated to be about 2, in reasonable\n agreement with estimates from sunspot data. The reversal epoch, during which the\n fluctuating contribution to the dipole is larger than that from the mean field, is about 4\n months. The memory time of the fluctuations is about 2 months. Observations demonstrate\n that the rms of the magnetic fluctuations is strongly modulated by the phase of the solar\n cycle. This gives additional support to the concept that the solar magnetic field is\n generated by a single dynamo mechanism rather than also by independent small-scale dynamo\n action. A suggestion of a weak nonaxisymmetric magnetic field of a fluctuating nature\n arises from the analysis, with a lifetime of about 1 year. \n Conclusions. The behaviour of the magnetic dipole during the reversal\n epoch gives valuable information about details of solar dynamo action.\n

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

\n Context. Observations show that the photospheric solar magnetic dipole\n usually does not vanish during the reversal of the solar magnetic field, which occurs in\n each solar cycle. In contrast, mean-field solar dynamo models predict that the dipole\n field does become zero. In a recent paper it was suggested that this contradiction could\n be explained as a large-scale manifestation of small-scale magnetic fluctuations of the\n surface poloidal field.\n Aims. Our aim is to confront this interpretation with the available\n observational data.\n Methods. Here we compare this interpretation with Wilcox Solar\n Observatory (WSO) photospheric magnetic field data in order to determine the amplitude of\n magnetic fluctuations required to explain the phenomenon and to compare the results with\n predictions from a simple dynamo model which takes these fluctuations into account.\n Results. We demonstrate that the WSO data concerning the magnetic dipole\n reversals are very similar to the predictions from our very simple solar dynamo model,\n which includes both mean magnetic field and fluctuations. The ratio between the rms value\n of the magnetic fluctuations and the mean field is estimated to be about 2, in reasonable\n agreement with estimates from sunspot data. The reversal epoch, during which the\n fluctuating contribution to the dipole is larger than that from the mean field, is about 4\n months. The memory time of the fluctuations is about 2 months. Observations demonstrate\n that the rms of the magnetic fluctuations is strongly modulated by the phase of the solar\n cycle. This gives additional support to the concept that the solar magnetic field is\n generated by a single dynamo mechanism rather than also by independent small-scale dynamo\n action. A suggestion of a weak nonaxisymmetric magnetic field of a fluctuating nature\n arises from the analysis, with a lifetime of about 1 year. \n Conclusions. The behaviour of the magnetic dipole during the reversal\n epoch gives valuable information about details of solar dynamo action.\n

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

\n Context. Observations show that the photospheric solar magnetic dipole\n usually does not vanish during the reversal of the solar magnetic field, which occurs in\n each solar cycle. In contrast, mean-field solar dynamo models predict that the dipole\n field does become zero. In a recent paper it was suggested that this contradiction could\n be explained as a large-scale manifestation of small-scale magnetic fluctuations of the\n surface poloidal field.\n Aims. Our aim is to confront this interpretation with the available\n observational data.\n Methods. Here we compare this interpretation with Wilcox Solar\n Observatory (WSO) photospheric magnetic field data in order to determine the amplitude of\n magnetic fluctuations required to explain the phenomenon and to compare the results with\n predictions from a simple dynamo model which takes these fluctuations into account.\n Results. We demonstrate that the WSO data concerning the magnetic dipole\n reversals are very similar to the predictions from our very simple solar dynamo model,\n which includes both mean magnetic field and fluctuations. The ratio between the rms value\n of the magnetic fluctuations and the mean field is estimated to be about 2, in reasonable\n agreement with estimates from sunspot data. The reversal epoch, during which the\n fluctuating contribution to the dipole is larger than that from the mean field, is about 4\n months. The memory time of the fluctuations is about 2 months. Observations demonstrate\n that the rms of the magnetic fluctuations is strongly modulated by the phase of the solar\n cycle. This gives additional support to the concept that the solar magnetic field is\n generated by a single dynamo mechanism rather than also by independent small-scale dynamo\n action. A suggestion of a weak nonaxisymmetric magnetic field of a fluctuating nature\n arises from the analysis, with a lifetime of about 1 year. \n Conclusions. The behaviour of the magnetic dipole during the reversal\n epoch gives valuable information about details of solar dynamo action.\n

Key concepts: Dynamo, Solar dynamo, Mercury's magnetic field, Physics, Dipole, Dipole model of the Earth's magnetic field, Context (archaeology), Magnetic field

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reversals of the solar magnetic dipole in the light of\n observational data and simple dynamo models — Research Paper | ScholarLens