2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Fluctuation dynamo and turbulent induction at low magnetic Prandtl numbers

A. A. Schekochihin, Alexey B. Iskakov, S. C. Cowley, James C. McWilliams, M. R. E. Proctor, Tarek A. Yousef

Open publisher page 147 citations

Abstract

doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/300 Abstract. This paper is a detailed report on a programme of direct numerical simulations of incompressible nonhelical randomly forced magnetohydrody-namic (MHD) turbulence that are used to settle a long-standing issue in the turbulent dynamo theory and demonstrate that the fluctuation dynamo exists in the limit of large magnetic Reynolds number Rm 1 and small magnetic Prandtl number Pm 1. The dependence of the critical Rmc for dynamo versus the hydrodynamic Reynolds number Re is obtained for 1 Re 6700. In the limit Pm 1, Rmc is at most three times larger than for the previously well established dynamo at large and moderate Prandtl numbers: Rmc 200 for Re 6000 com-pared to Rmc ∼ 60 for Pm 1. The stability curve Rmc(Re) (and, it is argued, the nature of the dynamo) is substantially different from the case of the simula-tions and liquid-metal experiments with a mean flow. It is not as yet possible to determine numerically whether the growth rate of the magnetic energy is ∝Rm1/2 in the limit Re Rm 1, as should be the case if the dynamo is driven by the inertial-range motions at the resistive scale, or tends to an Rm-independent value comparable to the turnover rate of the outer-scale motions. The magnetic-energy spectrum in the low-Pm regime is qualitatively different from the Pm 1 case 6 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/300 Abstract. This paper is a detailed report on a programme of direct numerical simulations of incompressible nonhelical randomly forced magnetohydrody-namic (MHD) turbulence that are used to settle a long-standing issue in the turbulent dynamo theory and demonstrate that the fluctuation dynamo exists in the limit of large magnetic Reynolds number Rm 1 and small magnetic Prandtl number Pm 1. The dependence of the critical Rmc for dynamo versus the hydrodynamic Reynolds number Re is obtained for 1 Re 6700. In the limit Pm 1, Rmc is at most three times larger than for the previously well established dynamo at large and moderate Prandtl numbers: Rmc 200 for Re 6000 com-pared to Rmc ∼ 60 for Pm 1. The stability curve Rmc(Re) (and, it is argued, the nature of the dynamo) is substantially different from the case of the simula-tions and liquid-metal experiments with a mean flow. It is not as yet possible to determine numerically whether the growth rate of the magnetic energy is ∝Rm1/2 in the limit Re Rm 1, as should be the case if the dynamo is driven by the inertial-range motions at the resistive scale, or tends to an Rm-independent value comparable to the turnover rate of the outer-scale motions. The magnetic-energy spectrum in the low-Pm regime is qualitatively different from the Pm 1 case 6 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 147 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/300 Abstract. This paper is a detailed report on a programme of direct numerical simulations of incompressible nonhelical randomly forced magnetohydrody-namic (MHD) turbulence that are used to settle a long-standing issue in the turbulent dynamo theory and demonstrate that the fluctuation dynamo exists in the limit of large magnetic Reynolds number Rm 1 and small magnetic Prandtl number Pm 1. The dependence of the critical Rmc for dynamo versus the hydrodynamic Reynolds number Re is obtained for 1 Re 6700. In the limit Pm 1, Rmc is at most three times larger than for the previously well established dynamo at large and moderate Prandtl numbers: Rmc 200 for Re 6000 com-pared to Rmc ∼ 60 for Pm 1. The stability curve Rmc(Re) (and, it is argued, the nature of the dynamo) is substantially different from the case of the simula-tions and liquid-metal experiments with a mean flow. It is not as yet possible to determine numerically whether the growth rate of the magnetic energy is ∝Rm1/2 in the limit Re Rm 1, as should be the case if the dynamo is driven by the inertial-range motions at the resistive scale, or tends to an Rm-independent value comparable to the turnover rate of the outer-scale motions. The magnetic-energy spectrum in the low-Pm regime is qualitatively different from the Pm 1 case 6 Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed.

Key concepts: Physics, Dynamo, Magnetic Reynolds number, Magnetic Prandtl number, Turbulence, Dynamo theory, Reynolds number, Prandtl number

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Fluctuation dynamo and turbulent induction at low magnetic Prandtl numbers — Research Paper | ScholarLens