2001Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)Requires access

The Ly-edge Paradox and the Need for Obscured QSOs

R. Maiolino, M. Salvati, A. Marconi, Robert Antonucci

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

Based on the most recent QSO ultraviolet spectra, the covering factor of the clouds of the Broad Line Region (BLR) is about 30%, or larger. This value would imply that in at least 30% of the QSOs our line of sight crosses one, or more, BLR clouds and, in the latter case, the UV spectrum should show a sharp Ly-edge in absorption. This Ly-edge in absorption is never observed. This paradox is solved if, as suggested by various authors, the BLR is flattened and the dusty gas in the outer parts, on the same plane, prevents the observation along the lines of sight passing through the BLR clouds. The objects observed edge-on (with respect to the flattened BLR) would be classified as obscured QSOs or, within the framework of the unified model, type 2 QSOs. The covering factor of the BLR constrains the fraction of obscured QSOs to be QSO2/QSO1 > 0.5. This lower limit is already high with respect to the number of candidate type 2 QSOs claimed so far. We discuss this constraint in relation to recent AGN surveys.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Based on the most recent QSO ultraviolet spectra, the covering factor of the clouds of the Broad Line Region (BLR) is about 30%, or larger. This value would imply that in at least 30% of the QSOs our line of sight crosses one, or more, BLR clouds and, in the latter case, the UV spectrum should show a sharp Ly-edge in absorption. This Ly-edge in absorption is never observed. This paradox is solved if, as suggested by various authors, the BLR is flattened and the dusty gas in the outer parts, on the same plane, prevents the observation along the lines of sight passing through the BLR clouds. The objects observed edge-on (with respect to the flattened BLR) would be classified as obscured QSOs or, within the framework of the unified model, type 2 QSOs. The covering factor of the BLR constrains the fraction of obscured QSOs to be QSO2/QSO1 > 0.5. This lower limit is already high with respect to the number of candidate type 2 QSOs claimed so far. We discuss this constraint in relation to recent AGN surveys.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Based on the most recent QSO ultraviolet spectra, the covering factor of the clouds of the Broad Line Region (BLR) is about 30%, or larger. This value would imply that in at least 30% of the QSOs our line of sight crosses one, or more, BLR clouds and, in the latter case, the UV spectrum should show a sharp Ly-edge in absorption. This Ly-edge in absorption is never observed. This paradox is solved if, as suggested by various authors, the BLR is flattened and the dusty gas in the outer parts, on the same plane, prevents the observation along the lines of sight passing through the BLR clouds. The objects observed edge-on (with respect to the flattened BLR) would be classified as obscured QSOs or, within the framework of the unified model, type 2 QSOs. The covering factor of the BLR constrains the fraction of obscured QSOs to be QSO2/QSO1 > 0.5. This lower limit is already high with respect to the number of candidate type 2 QSOs claimed so far. We discuss this constraint in relation to recent AGN surveys.

Key concepts: QSOS, Astrophysics, Physics, Line-of-sight, Line (geometry), Spectral line, Astronomy, Galaxy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Ly-edge Paradox and the Need for Obscured QSOs — Research Paper | ScholarLens