2008•Unpublished venueRequires access

Chapter III. Legal Conclusion or Interpretative Process? Lex Specialis and the Applicability of International Human Rights Standards

Conor McCarthy

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Few areas of international law exist in such close, but complex, proximity to other areas of legal regulation as international human rights law. While humanitarian law is conceived of specifically to address the kinds of situations which arise in warfare and the dynamics which underpins them, the relevance and applicability of human rights standards is more subtle and context dependent. This chapter examines the role lex specialis occupies in international legal reasoning. It seeks to use these understandings to shed some further light on the issues of applicability where humanitarian law is concurrently applicable alongside human rights norms. In a very real sense then human rights and humanitarian law cohabit the same factual space during armed conflict. The chapter highlights some important aspects of the complex and nuanced interrelationship between these two bodies of law, focusing on lex specialis as the central bridge between them. Keywords: armed conflict; humanitarian law; international human rights law; international law; legal reasoning; lex specialis

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Few areas of international law exist in such close, but complex, proximity to other areas of legal regulation as international human rights law. While humanitarian law is conceived of specifically to address the kinds of situations which arise in warfare and the dynamics which underpins them, the relevance and applicability of human rights standards is more subtle and context dependent. This chapter examines the role lex specialis occupies in international legal reasoning. It seeks to use these understandings to shed some further light on the issues of applicability where humanitarian law is concurrently applicable alongside human rights norms. In a very real sense then human rights and humanitarian law cohabit the same factual space during armed conflict. The chapter highlights some important aspects of the complex and nuanced interrelationship between these two bodies of law, focusing on lex specialis as the central bridge between them. Keywords: armed conflict; humanitarian law; international human rights law; international law; legal reasoning; lex specialis

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Few areas of international law exist in such close, but complex, proximity to other areas of legal regulation as international human rights law. While humanitarian law is conceived of specifically to address the kinds of situations which arise in warfare and the dynamics which underpins them, the relevance and applicability of human rights standards is more subtle and context dependent. This chapter examines the role lex specialis occupies in international legal reasoning. It seeks to use these understandings to shed some further light on the issues of applicability where humanitarian law is concurrently applicable alongside human rights norms. In a very real sense then human rights and humanitarian law cohabit the same factual space during armed conflict. The chapter highlights some important aspects of the complex and nuanced interrelationship between these two bodies of law, focusing on lex specialis as the central bridge between them. Keywords: armed conflict; humanitarian law; international human rights law; international law; legal reasoning; lex specialis

Key concepts: Human rights, Political science, Process (computing), Law and economics, Law, Sociology, Computer science, Operating system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Chapter III. Legal Conclusion or Interpretative Process? Lex Specialis and the Applicability of International Human Rights Standards — Research Paper | ScholarLens