A Lower Limit on the Mass of Our Galaxy from the H3 Survey
Dennis Zaritsky, Charlie Conroy, Huanian Zhang, Ana Bonaca, Nelson Caldwell, Phillip A. Cargile, Benjamin D. Johnson, Rohan P. Naidu
Abstract
Dennis Zaritsky, Charlie Conroy, Huanian Zhang, Ana Bonaca, Nelson Caldwell, Phillip A. Cargile, Benjamin D. Johnson, Rohan P. Naidu
Abstract
The timing argument provides a lower limit on the mass of the Milky Way. We find, using a sample of 32 stars at $R > 60$ kpc drawn from the H3 Spectroscopic Survey and mock catalogs created from published numerical simulations, that M$_{200} > 0.91\times 10^{12}$ M$_\odot$ with 90% confidence. We recommend using this limit to refine the allowed prior mass range in more complex and sophisticated statistical treatments of Milky Way dynamics. The use of such a prior would have significantly reduced many previously published uncertainty ranges. Our analysis suggests that the most likely value of M$_{200}$ is $\sim 1.4 \times 10^{12}$ M$_\odot$, but establishing this as the Milky Way mass requires a larger sample of outer halo stars and a more complete analysis of the inner halo stars in H3. The imminent growth in the sample of outer halo stars due to ongoing and planned surveys will make this possible.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The timing argument provides a lower limit on the mass of the Milky Way. We find, using a sample of 32 stars at $R > 60$ kpc drawn from the H3 Spectroscopic Survey and mock catalogs created from published numerical simulations, that M$_{200} > 0.91\times 10^{12}$ M$_\odot$ with 90% confidence. We recommend using this limit to refine the allowed prior mass range in more complex and sophisticated statistical treatments of Milky Way dynamics. The use of such a prior would have significantly reduced many previously published uncertainty ranges. Our analysis suggests that the most likely value of M$_{200}$ is $\sim 1.4 \times 10^{12}$ M$_\odot$, but establishing this as the Milky Way mass requires a larger sample of outer halo stars and a more complete analysis of the inner halo stars in H3. The imminent growth in the sample of outer halo stars due to ongoing and planned surveys will make this possible.
Key concepts: Physics, Astrophysics, Limit (mathematics), Galaxy, Astronomy, Mathematical analysis, Mathematics