2001School Psychology ReviewRequires access

Predicting Student Success on a State-mandated Performance-based Assessment Using Oral Reading Fluency

Scott A. Stage, Michael Dilou Jacobsen

Open publisher page 185 citations

Abstract

One hundred seventy-three fourth graders were administered curriculum-based oral reading fluency measures in September, January, and May. A growth curve analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between students' slope in oral reading fluency and the Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) reading assessment, which was administered in May. Slope in oral reading fluency across the school year and the oral reading fluency probes administered in September, January, and May reliably predicted May WASL reading performance. Follow-up analyses showed statistically reliable cut-scores based on students' oral reading fluency performance in September, January, and May. Based on these cut-scores, the positive predictive power that September oral reading fluency low scores predicted WASL failure was.41, and the negative predictive power that September oral reading fluency high scores predicted WASL success was.90. These rates are higher than the WASL failure base rate of 20% and the WASL pass base rate of 80% found in this sample. The clinical utility of using these procedures is discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One hundred seventy-three fourth graders were administered curriculum-based oral reading fluency measures in September, January, and May. A growth curve analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between students' slope in oral reading fluency and the Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) reading assessment, which was administered in May. Slope in oral reading fluency across the school year and the oral reading fluency probes administered in September, January, and May reliably predicted May WASL reading performance. Follow-up analyses showed statistically reliable cut-scores based on students' oral reading fluency performance in September, January, and May. Based on these cut-scores, the positive predictive power that September oral reading fluency low scores predicted WASL failure was.41, and the negative predictive power that September oral reading fluency high scores predicted WASL success was.90. These rates are higher than the WASL failure base rate of 20% and the WASL pass base rate of 80% found in this sample. The clinical utility of using these procedures is discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 185 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One hundred seventy-three fourth graders were administered curriculum-based oral reading fluency measures in September, January, and May. A growth curve analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between students' slope in oral reading fluency and the Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL) reading assessment, which was administered in May. Slope in oral reading fluency across the school year and the oral reading fluency probes administered in September, January, and May reliably predicted May WASL reading performance. Follow-up analyses showed statistically reliable cut-scores based on students' oral reading fluency performance in September, January, and May. Based on these cut-scores, the positive predictive power that September oral reading fluency low scores predicted WASL failure was.41, and the negative predictive power that September oral reading fluency high scores predicted WASL success was.90. These rates are higher than the WASL failure base rate of 20% and the WASL pass base rate of 80% found in this sample. The clinical utility of using these procedures is discussed.

Key concepts: Fluency, Curriculum-based measurement, Reading (process), Psychology, Curriculum, Audiology, Developmental psychology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predicting Student Success on a State-mandated Performance-based Assessment Using Oral Reading Fluency — Research Paper | ScholarLens