2020bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Open access

Imaging biomarkers for motor outcome after stroke – should we include information from beyond the primary motor system?

Christoph Sperber, Johannes Rennig, Hans‐Otto Karnath

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Hemiparesis is a common consequence of stroke to the primary motor system. Previous studies suggested that damage to additional brain areas might play a causal role in the occurrence and severity of hemiparesis and its recovery. Knowledge of these regions might be applied in the creation of imaging biomarkers for motor outcome prediction if lesion information from such areas carries predictive value. We assessed acute and chronic paresis of the upper limb in 102 patients with unilateral stroke. In a first experiment, the neural correlates of acute and chronic upper limb paresis were mapped by lesion behaviour mapping. Following the same approach, a lesion biomarker of corticospinal tract (CST) damage was mapped. This analysis served as an artificial control condition as the biomarker, by definition, is only causally related to damage of the CST. Mapping acute or chronic upper limb paresis implicated areas outside of the primary motor system. Likewise, mapping the CST lesion biomarker implicated several areas outside of the CST with high correspondence to areas associated with upper limb paresis. Damage to areas outside of the primary motor system thus might, to some degree, not play a causal role in hemiparesis. In a second experiment, we showed that lesion information from these areas outside of the primary motor system can be used to predict motor outcome. This was even the case for the CST lesion biomarker. Although the only causal source underlying the CST lesion biomarker was damage to the CST, lesion information that mainly included non-CST regions was able to predict the biomarker (non-significantly) better than information taken from only the CST itself. These findings suggest that simple theory-based biomarkers or qualitative rules to infer post-stroke outcome from imaging data might perform sub-optimally, as they do not consider the complexity of lesion data. Instead, high-dimensional models with data-driven feature selection strategies might be required.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Hemiparesis is a common consequence of stroke to the primary motor system. Previous studies suggested that damage to additional brain areas might play a causal role in the occurrence and severity of hemiparesis and its recovery. Knowledge of these regions might be applied in the creation of imaging biomarkers for motor outcome prediction if lesion information from such areas carries predictive value. We assessed acute and chronic paresis of the upper limb in 102 patients with unilateral stroke. In a first experiment, the neural correlates of acute and chronic upper limb paresis were mapped by lesion behaviour mapping. Following the same approach, a lesion biomarker of corticospinal tract (CST) damage was mapped. This analysis served as an artificial control condition as the biomarker, by definition, is only causally related to damage of the CST. Mapping acute or chronic upper limb paresis implicated areas outside of the primary motor system. Likewise, mapping the CST lesion biomarker implicated several areas outside of the CST with high correspondence to areas associated with upper limb paresis. Damage to areas outside of the primary motor system thus might, to some degree, not play a causal role in hemiparesis. In a second experiment, we showed that lesion information from these areas outside of the primary motor system can be used to predict motor outcome. This was even the case for the CST lesion biomarker. Although the only causal source underlying the CST lesion biomarker was damage to the CST, lesion information that mainly included non-CST regions was able to predict the biomarker (non-significantly) better than information taken from only the CST itself. These findings suggest that simple theory-based biomarkers or qualitative rules to infer post-stroke outcome from imaging data might perform sub-optimally, as they do not consider the complexity of lesion data. Instead, high-dimensional models with data-driven feature selection strategies might be required.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Hemiparesis is a common consequence of stroke to the primary motor system. Previous studies suggested that damage to additional brain areas might play a causal role in the occurrence and severity of hemiparesis and its recovery. Knowledge of these regions might be applied in the creation of imaging biomarkers for motor outcome prediction if lesion information from such areas carries predictive value. We assessed acute and chronic paresis of the upper limb in 102 patients with unilateral stroke. In a first experiment, the neural correlates of acute and chronic upper limb paresis were mapped by lesion behaviour mapping. Following the same approach, a lesion biomarker of corticospinal tract (CST) damage was mapped. This analysis served as an artificial control condition as the biomarker, by definition, is only causally related to damage of the CST. Mapping acute or chronic upper limb paresis implicated areas outside of the primary motor system. Likewise, mapping the CST lesion biomarker implicated several areas outside of the CST with high correspondence to areas associated with upper limb paresis. Damage to areas outside of the primary motor system thus might, to some degree, not play a causal role in hemiparesis. In a second experiment, we showed that lesion information from these areas outside of the primary motor system can be used to predict motor outcome. This was even the case for the CST lesion biomarker. Although the only causal source underlying the CST lesion biomarker was damage to the CST, lesion information that mainly included non-CST regions was able to predict the biomarker (non-significantly) better than information taken from only the CST itself. These findings suggest that simple theory-based biomarkers or qualitative rules to infer post-stroke outcome from imaging data might perform sub-optimally, as they do not consider the complexity of lesion data. Instead, high-dimensional models with data-driven feature selection strategies might be required.

Key concepts: Hemiparesis, Paresis, Lesion, Corticospinal tract, Stroke (engine), Biomarker, Medicine, Physical medicine and rehabilitation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Imaging biomarkers for motor outcome after stroke – should we include information from beyond the primary motor system? — Research Paper | ScholarLens