The regulation of commercial surrogacy in Australia: A harm analysis
Tammy Johnson
Abstract
Open-access reader
Tammy Johnson
Abstract
Open-access reader
This thesis analyses the harm unique to commercial surrogacy, concluding that the prohibition of commercial surrogacy in Australia is not justified. It critiques the regulation of commercial surrogacy in Australia against a framework based on Mill’s Harm Principle which holds that the only justification for intervention into the lives of individuals is for the prevention of harm to others.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This thesis analyses the harm unique to commercial surrogacy, concluding that the prohibition of commercial surrogacy in Australia is not justified. It critiques the regulation of commercial surrogacy in Australia against a framework based on Mill’s Harm Principle which holds that the only justification for intervention into the lives of individuals is for the prevention of harm to others.
Key concepts: Harm, Harm principle, Mill, Intervention (counseling), Do no harm, Law, Political science, Criminology