Variations in Stellar Clustering with Environment: Dispersed Star Formation and the Origin of Faint Fuzzies
Bruce G. Elmegreen
Abstract
Bruce G. Elmegreen
Abstract
The observed increase in star formation efficiency with average cloud density, from several percent in whole giant molecular clouds to ∼ 30 % or more in clusterforming cores, can be understood as the result of hierarchical cloud structure if there is a characteristic density as which individual stars become well defined. Also in this case, the efficiency of star formation increases with the dispersion of the density probability distribution function (pdf). Models with log-normal pdf’s illustrate these effects. The difference between star formation in bound clusters and star formation in loose groupings is attributed to a difference in cloud pressure, with higher pressures forming more tightly bound clusters. This correlation accounts for the observed increase in clustering fraction with star formation rate and with the observation of Scaled OB Associations in low pressure environments. “Faint fuzzie ” star clusters, which are bound but have low densities, can form in regions with high Mach numbers and low background tidal forces. The proposal by Burkert, Brodie & Larsen (2005) that faint fuzzies form at large radii in galactic collisional rings, satisfies these constraints. Subject headings: stars: formation — ISM: structure — open clusters and associations: general 1.
OpenAlex reports 91 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The observed increase in star formation efficiency with average cloud density, from several percent in whole giant molecular clouds to ∼ 30 % or more in clusterforming cores, can be understood as the result of hierarchical cloud structure if there is a characteristic density as which individual stars become well defined. Also in this case, the efficiency of star formation increases with the dispersion of the density probability distribution function (pdf). Models with log-normal pdf’s illustrate these effects. The difference between star formation in bound clusters and star formation in loose groupings is attributed to a difference in cloud pressure, with higher pressures forming more tightly bound clusters. This correlation accounts for the observed increase in clustering fraction with star formation rate and with the observation of Scaled OB Associations in low pressure environments. “Faint fuzzie ” star clusters, which are bound but have low densities, can form in regions with high Mach numbers and low background tidal forces. The proposal by Burkert, Brodie & Larsen (2005) that faint fuzzies form at large radii in galactic collisional rings, satisfies these constraints. Subject headings: stars: formation — ISM: structure — open clusters and associations: general 1.
Key concepts: Physics, Star formation, Astrophysics, Star cluster, Molecular cloud, Stars, Log-normal distribution, Cluster (spacecraft)