Rainfall forecasting model using machine learning methods: Case study Terengganu, Malaysia
Wanie M. Ridwan, Michelle Sapitang, Awatif Aziz, Khairul Faizal Kushiar, Ali Najah Ahmed, Ahmed El‐Shafie
Abstract
Open-access reader
Wanie M. Ridwan, Michelle Sapitang, Awatif Aziz, Khairul Faizal Kushiar, Ali Najah Ahmed, Ahmed El‐Shafie
Abstract
Open-access reader
Rainfall plays a main role in managing the water level in the reservoir. The unpredictable amount of rainfall due to the climate change can cause either overflow or dry in the reservoir. In this study, several models and methods were applied to predict the rainfall data in Tasik Kenyir, Terengganu. The comparative study was conducted focusing on developing and comparing several Machine Learning (ML) models, evaluating different scenarios and time horizon, and forecasting rainfall using two types of methods. Data involved for this research consist of taking the average rainfall from 10 stations around the study area using Thiessen polygon to weight the station area and projected rainfall. The forecasting model uses four different ML algorithms, which are Bayesian Linear Regression (BLR), Boosted Decision Tree Regression (BDTR), Decision Forest Regression (DFR) and Neural Network Regression (NNR). On the other hand, the rainfall was predicted on different time horizon by using different ML’s algorithms which is method 1 (M1): Forecasting Rainfall Using Autocorrelation Function (ACF) and method 2 (M2): Forecasting Rainfall Using Projected Error. In M1, the best regression developed for ACF is BDTR since it has the highest coefficient of determination, R2, after tuning the hyperparameter. The results show coefficient between 0.5 and 0.9 with the highest of each scenarios for daily (0.9739693), weekly (0.989461), 10-days (0.9894429) and monthly (0.9998085). In M2, overall model performances show that normalization using LogNormal is preferably giving a good result of each categories except for 10-days with BDTR and DFR are the most acceptable result than NNR and BLR. It is concluded that, two different methods have been applied with different scenarios and different time horizons, and M1 shows a rather high accuracy than M2 using BDTR modeling.
OpenAlex reports 260 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Rainfall plays a main role in managing the water level in the reservoir. The unpredictable amount of rainfall due to the climate change can cause either overflow or dry in the reservoir. In this study, several models and methods were applied to predict the rainfall data in Tasik Kenyir, Terengganu. The comparative study was conducted focusing on developing and comparing several Machine Learning (ML) models, evaluating different scenarios and time horizon, and forecasting rainfall using two types of methods. Data involved for this research consist of taking the average rainfall from 10 stations around the study area using Thiessen polygon to weight the station area and projected rainfall. The forecasting model uses four different ML algorithms, which are Bayesian Linear Regression (BLR), Boosted Decision Tree Regression (BDTR), Decision Forest Regression (DFR) and Neural Network Regression (NNR). On the other hand, the rainfall was predicted on different time horizon by using different ML’s algorithms which is method 1 (M1): Forecasting Rainfall Using Autocorrelation Function (ACF) and method 2 (M2): Forecasting Rainfall Using Projected Error. In M1, the best regression developed for ACF is BDTR since it has the highest coefficient of determination, R2, after tuning the hyperparameter. The results show coefficient between 0.5 and 0.9 with the highest of each scenarios for daily (0.9739693), weekly (0.989461), 10-days (0.9894429) and monthly (0.9998085). In M2, overall model performances show that normalization using LogNormal is preferably giving a good result of each categories except for 10-days with BDTR and DFR are the most acceptable result than NNR and BLR. It is concluded that, two different methods have been applied with different scenarios and different time horizons, and M1 shows a rather high accuracy than M2 using BDTR modeling.
Key concepts: Artificial neural network, Statistics, Regression, Linear regression, Decision tree, Environmental science, Regression analysis, Random forest