Optimal Bounds for Approximate Counting
Jelani Nelson, Huacheng Yu
Abstract
Open-access reader
Jelani Nelson, Huacheng Yu
Abstract
Open-access reader
Storing a counter incremented N times would naively consume O(log N) bits of memory. In 1978 Morris described the very first streaming algorithm: the "Morris Counter" [15]. His algorithm's space bound is a random variable, and it has been shown to be O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log(1/δ)) bits in expectation to provide a (1+ε)-approximation with probability $1-δ to the counter's value. We provide a new simple algorithm with a simple analysis showing that randomized space O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log log(1/δ)) bits suffice for the same task, i.e. an exponentially improved dependence on the inverse failure probability. We then provide a new analysis showing that the original Morris Counter itself, after a minor but necessary tweak, actually also enjoys this same improved upper bound. Lastly, we prove a new lower bound for this task showing optimality of our upper bound. We thus completely resolve the asymptotic space complexity of approximate counting. Furthermore all our constants are explicit, and our lower bound and tightest upper bound differ by a multiplicative factor of at most 3+o(1).
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Storing a counter incremented N times would naively consume O(log N) bits of memory. In 1978 Morris described the very first streaming algorithm: the "Morris Counter" [15]. His algorithm's space bound is a random variable, and it has been shown to be O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log(1/δ)) bits in expectation to provide a (1+ε)-approximation with probability $1-δ to the counter's value. We provide a new simple algorithm with a simple analysis showing that randomized space O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log log(1/δ)) bits suffice for the same task, i.e. an exponentially improved dependence on the inverse failure probability. We then provide a new analysis showing that the original Morris Counter itself, after a minor but necessary tweak, actually also enjoys this same improved upper bound. Lastly, we prove a new lower bound for this task showing optimality of our upper bound. We thus completely resolve the asymptotic space complexity of approximate counting. Furthermore all our constants are explicit, and our lower bound and tightest upper bound differ by a multiplicative factor of at most 3+o(1).
Key concepts: Upper and lower bounds, Binary logarithm, Multiplicative function, Mathematics, Log-log plot, Combinatorics, Inverse, Simple (philosophy)