2022•Unpublished venueOpen access

Optimal Bounds for Approximate Counting

Jelani Nelson, Huacheng Yu

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

Storing a counter incremented N times would naively consume O(log N) bits of memory. In 1978 Morris described the very first streaming algorithm: the "Morris Counter" [15]. His algorithm's space bound is a random variable, and it has been shown to be O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log(1/δ)) bits in expectation to provide a (1+ε)-approximation with probability $1-δ to the counter's value. We provide a new simple algorithm with a simple analysis showing that randomized space O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log log(1/δ)) bits suffice for the same task, i.e. an exponentially improved dependence on the inverse failure probability. We then provide a new analysis showing that the original Morris Counter itself, after a minor but necessary tweak, actually also enjoys this same improved upper bound. Lastly, we prove a new lower bound for this task showing optimality of our upper bound. We thus completely resolve the asymptotic space complexity of approximate counting. Furthermore all our constants are explicit, and our lower bound and tightest upper bound differ by a multiplicative factor of at most 3+o(1).

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Storing a counter incremented N times would naively consume O(log N) bits of memory. In 1978 Morris described the very first streaming algorithm: the "Morris Counter" [15]. His algorithm's space bound is a random variable, and it has been shown to be O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log(1/δ)) bits in expectation to provide a (1+ε)-approximation with probability $1-δ to the counter's value. We provide a new simple algorithm with a simple analysis showing that randomized space O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log log(1/δ)) bits suffice for the same task, i.e. an exponentially improved dependence on the inverse failure probability. We then provide a new analysis showing that the original Morris Counter itself, after a minor but necessary tweak, actually also enjoys this same improved upper bound. Lastly, we prove a new lower bound for this task showing optimality of our upper bound. We thus completely resolve the asymptotic space complexity of approximate counting. Furthermore all our constants are explicit, and our lower bound and tightest upper bound differ by a multiplicative factor of at most 3+o(1).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Storing a counter incremented N times would naively consume O(log N) bits of memory. In 1978 Morris described the very first streaming algorithm: the "Morris Counter" [15]. His algorithm's space bound is a random variable, and it has been shown to be O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log(1/δ)) bits in expectation to provide a (1+ε)-approximation with probability $1-δ to the counter's value. We provide a new simple algorithm with a simple analysis showing that randomized space O(log log N + log(1/ε) + log log(1/δ)) bits suffice for the same task, i.e. an exponentially improved dependence on the inverse failure probability. We then provide a new analysis showing that the original Morris Counter itself, after a minor but necessary tweak, actually also enjoys this same improved upper bound. Lastly, we prove a new lower bound for this task showing optimality of our upper bound. We thus completely resolve the asymptotic space complexity of approximate counting. Furthermore all our constants are explicit, and our lower bound and tightest upper bound differ by a multiplicative factor of at most 3+o(1).

Key concepts: Upper and lower bounds, Binary logarithm, Multiplicative function, Mathematics, Log-log plot, Combinatorics, Inverse, Simple (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimal Bounds for Approximate Counting — Research Paper | ScholarLens